IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v125y2021ics1389934121000253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What makes the traditional forest-related knowledge deteriorate? A case of Dengcen village in Southwestern China

Author

Listed:
  • Yinghe, Huang
  • Yeo-Chang, Youn

Abstract

Traditional forest-related knowledge (TFK) is under the risk of disappearance in many parts of the world, even though it can be an important source of knowledge for sustainable development. This study aims to assess the status of TFK retention and further identify the factors contributing to the erosion of TFK. A case of Dengcen, an ethnic village located in the Guizhou province of Southwest China was investigated. The degree of TFK retained by the village inhabitants of different generations was measured using a quantitative approach, with a vitality index of traditional environmental knowledge (VITEK). We found that age, gender, experience with urban life, and formal education level of an individual were influential factors that explained TFK retention in rural societies in China. In particular, formal education and urban expansion were found to be the main drivers of accelerating the deterioration of traditional forest-related knowledge. These findings have implications regarding sustainable forest management for policy makers that formal and informal education systems should be integrated in order to ensure traditional forest knowledge of local communities to contribute to sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinghe, Huang & Yeo-Chang, Youn, 2021. "What makes the traditional forest-related knowledge deteriorate? A case of Dengcen village in Southwestern China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:125:y:2021:i:c:s1389934121000253
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934121000253
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102419?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng Yuan & Fei Lun & Lu He & Zhi Cao & Qingwen Min & Yanying Bai & Moucheng Liu & Shengkui Cheng & Wenhua Li & Anthony M. Fuller, 2014. "Exploring the State of Retention of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) in a Hani Rice Terrace Village, Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. İklil Selçuk & Zeynep Delen Nircan & Burcu Selcen Coşkun, 2023. "Imagining Decent Work towards a Green Future in a Former Forest Village of the City of Istanbul," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Honglian Hua & Shangyi Zhou & Zhiqiang Ding & Yujun Pan, 2018. "The Change Mechanism of Human-Environment Interactions from the Perspective of Contextualization: A Case Study of the Honghe Hani Rice Terraces as a World Cultural Heritage Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Nan Ma & Siyuan He & Qingwen Min, 2020. "Edible Biological Resource Use in an Agricultural Heritage System and Its Driving Forces: A Case of the Shuangjiang Mengku Ancient Tea and Culture System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Yongxun Zhang & Qingwen Min & Heyao Li & Lulu He & Canqiang Zhang & Lun Yang, 2017. "A Conservation Approach of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS): Improving Traditional Agricultural Patterns and Promoting Scale-Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Joana Gonçalves & Ricardo Mateus & José Dinis Silvestre & Ana Pereira Roders, 2020. "Going beyond Good Intentions for the Sustainable Conservation of Built Heritage: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-28, November.
    5. Guilin Liu & Domenico M. Doronzo, 2020. "A Novel Approach to Bridging Physical, Cultural, and Socioeconomic Indicators with Spatial Distributions of Agricultural Heritage Systems (AHS) in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Qingwen Min & Bitian Zhang, 2019. "Research Progress in the Conservation and Development of China-Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (China-NIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Wenjun Jiao & Qingwen Min, 2017. "Reviewing the Progress in the Identification, Conservation and Management of China-Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (China-NIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Honglian Hua & Shangyi Zhou, 2015. "Human-Environment System Boundaries: A Case Study of the Honghe Hani Rice Terraces as a World Heritage Cultural Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Paichi Pat Shein & Peresang Sukinarhimi, 2022. "Taboos as a Social Mechanism Keeping the Human-Nature Balance: Core Values and Practices of Rukai Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Water," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Dedeurwaerdere, Tom & Hannachi, Mourad, 2019. "Socio-economic drivers of coexistence of landraces and modern crop varieties in agro-biodiversity rich Yunnan rice fields," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 177-188.
    11. Wenjun Jiao & Zhounan Yu & Yehong Sun & Yang Liu, 2023. "An Analytical Framework for Formulating Conservation and Development Measures for Important Agricultural Heritage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Lun Yang & Moucheng Liu & Fei Lun & Zheng Yuan & Yongxun Zhang & Qingwen Min, 2017. "An Analysis on Crops Choice and Its Driving Factors in Agricultural Heritage Systems—A Case of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Honglian Hua & Yikun Wang & Zhiqiang Ding & Hua Liu & Shangyi Zhou & Yuli Liu, 2022. "Relationship, Discourse and Construction: The Power Process and Environmental Impact of the Honghe Hani Rice Terraces as a World Heritage Site," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Mi Tian & Qingwen Min & Fei Lun & Zheng Yuan & Anthony M. Fuller & Lun Yang & Yongxun Zhang & Jie Zhou, 2015. "Evaluation of Tourism Water Capacity in Agricultural Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Stephen Morse & Ioannis Vogiatzakis, 2014. "Special Edition: Environment in Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-5, November.
    16. Moucheng Liu & Qingwen Min & Lun Yang, 2018. "Rice Pricing during Organic Conversion of the Honghe Hani Rice Terrace System in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, January.
    17. Chang Li & Tong Tong & Shutong Ge, 2023. "Evaluating the Ecological Sustainability of Agrifood Land in Ethnic Minority Areas: A Comparative Study in Yunnan China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Yuan Yuan & Gangchun Xu & Nannan Shen & Zhijuan Nie & Hongxia Li & Lin Zhang & Yunchong Gong & Yanhui He & Xiaofei Ma & Hongyan Zhang & Jian Zhu & Jinrong Duan & Pao Xu, 2022. "Valuation of Ecosystem Services for the Sustainable Development of Hani Terraces: A Rice–Fish–Duck Integrated Farming Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Doreen Ingosan Allasiw & Toshinori Tanaka & Takashi Mino, 2017. "Costly Barriers to Sustainable Institutions: Empirical Evidence from State-Reinforced Management of a Communal Irrigation System in the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:125:y:2021:i:c:s1389934121000253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.