IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v119y2020ics1389934120302999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assessment of the international competitiveness of China's forest products industry

Author

Listed:
  • Su, Haiying
  • Hou, Fangmiao
  • Yang, Yixin
  • Han, Zheng
  • Liu, Can

Abstract

Using a cutting-edge method and value-added trade data for 33 countries from 2005 to 2015, we assess the international competitiveness of China's forest products industry in this paper. The international competitiveness is measured with three indices—revealed comparative advantage, and participation and position in the global value chains (GVCs). Our results show that China's forest products industry has gradually moved away from its large-but-weak status and started to mature and participate in the GVCs more competitively. With a strong comparative advantage of cheap labour resources in the past, the country has developed a labour-intensive forest products industry and raised its GVC position together with an ever higher participation. The heightened level of participation has come from the upward-trending, forward participation along the GVCs, whereas the backward participation has witnessed a downward movement over time. This study can thus help the industry identify concrete problems in factor allocation and structural upgrading and formulate specific measures for maintaining and enhancing its competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Su, Haiying & Hou, Fangmiao & Yang, Yixin & Han, Zheng & Liu, Can, 2020. "An assessment of the international competitiveness of China's forest products industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:119:y:2020:i:c:s1389934120302999
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934120302999
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Koopman & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2014. "Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(2), pages 459-494, February.
    2. Marcel P. Timmer & Bart Los & Robert Stehrer & Gaaitzen J. de Vries, 2013. "Fragmentation, incomes and jobs: an analysis of European competitiveness [Who captures value in global supply chains?]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 28(76), pages 613-661.
    3. Elsa Leromain & Gianluca Orefice, 2014. "New revealed comparative advantage index: Dataset and empirical distribution," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 139, pages 48-70.
    4. Logan T. Lewis, 2013. "Trade in Value-Added," IFDP Notes 2013-12-03-3, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    5. De Backer, Koen & Miroudot, Sébastien, 2014. "Mapping global value chains," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 37176.
    6. Rossato, Fabrícia Gladys F.S. & Susaeta, Andres & Adams, Damian C. & Hidalgo, Ieda Geriberto & de Araujo, Thais Duekc & de Queiroz, Adriana, 2018. "Comparison of revealed comparative advantage indexes with application to trade tendencies of cellulose production from planted forests in Brazil, Canada, China, Sweden, Finland and the United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 59-66.
    7. Ms. Faezeh Raei & Anna Ignatenko & Borislava Mircheva, 2019. "Global Value Chains: What are the Benefits and Why Do Countries Participate?," IMF Working Papers 2019/018, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Ke, Shuifa & Qiao, Dan & Yuan, Wantong & He, Youjun, 2020. "Broadening the scope of forest transition inquiry: What does China's experience suggest?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    9. Jing Peng & Yabin Zhang, 2020. "Impact of Global Value Chains on Export Technology Content of China’s Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Gehl Sampath, Padmashree & Vallejo, Bertha, 2018. "Global Value Chains and Upgrading: What, When and How?," MERIT Working Papers 2018-016, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    11. Hou, Jianyun & Yin, Runsheng & Wu, Weiguang, 2019. "Intensifying Forest Management in China: What does it mean, why, and how?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 82-89.
    12. repec:cii:cepiei:2014-q3-139-3 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Padmashree Gehl Sampath & Bertha Vallejo, 2018. "Trade, Global Value Chains and Upgrading: What, When and How?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 481-504, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrius Zuoza & Vaida Pilinkienė, 2021. "Energy Efficiency and Carbon Emission Impact on Competitiveness in the European Energy Intensive Industries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Epede, Mesumbe Bianca & Wang, Daoping, 2022. "Competitiveness and upgrading in global value chains: A multiple-country analysis of the wooden furniture industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Hao Chen & Juanjuan Cao & Hongge Zhu & Yufang Wang, 2022. "Understanding Household Vulnerability and Relative Poverty in Forestry Transition: A Study on Forestry-Worker Families in China’s Greater Khingan Mountains State-Owned Forest Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Epede, Mesumbe Bianca & Wang, Daoping, 2022. "Competitiveness and upgrading in global value chains: A multiple-country analysis of the wooden furniture industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Fertö, I., 2018. "Global Agri-food Trade Competitiveness: Gross Versus Value Added Exports," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 10(4), December.
    3. Rongrong Zhou & Decai Tang & Dan Da & Wenya Chen & Lin Kong & Valentina Boamah, 2022. "Research on China’s Manufacturing Industry Moving towards the Middle and High-End of the GVC Driven by Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    4. Maria Savona, 2021. "Revisiting High Development Theory to Explain Upgrading Prospects in Business Services Global Value Chains," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(2), pages 206-226, April.
    5. Amat Adarov & Robert Stehrer, 2021. "Implications of foreign direct investment, capital formation and its structure for global value chains," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(11), pages 3246-3299, November.
    6. Nenci, Silvia & Fusacchia, Ilaria & Giunta, Anna & Montalbano, Pierluigi & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2022. "Mapping global value chain participation and positioning in agriculture and food: stylised facts, empirical evidence and critical issues," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(2), July.
    7. Carpa, Nur & Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada, 2022. "The impact of global value chain participation on income inequality," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 269-290.
    8. Zicheng Ma & Liang Wang & Xin Zheng & Jianqi Zhang, 2022. "National Innovation Systems and Global Value Chain Participation: The Role of Entrepreneurship," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 897-920, April.
    9. Gordeev, Roman, 2020. "Comparative advantages of Russian forest products on the global market," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Gabriele di Filippo, 2018. "What place does Luxembourg hold in global value chains?," BCL working papers 120, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    11. Biswajit Banerjee & Juraj Zeman, 2020. "Determinants of Global Value Chain Participation: Cross-country Analysis," Working Papers 25, Ashoka University, Department of Economics.
    12. Guida Nogueira & Paulo Inácio, 2019. "A Look at the main channels of Potential Impact of Brexit on the Portuguese Economy," GEE Papers 0120, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised May 2019.
    13. Marta Solaz, 2018. "Value added and participation in global value chains: The case of Spain," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 2804-2827, October.
    14. Janet Ceglowski, 2017. "Assessing Export Competitiveness through the Lens of Value Added," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 275-296, February.
    15. Ferraz, Lucas Pedreira do Couto & Gutierre, Leopoldo & Cabral, Rodolfo Arruda, 2015. "The manufacturing industry in Brazil in the era of global value chains," Textos para discussão 402, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    16. Halit Yanikkaya & Abdullah Altun & Pınar Tat, 2022. "Does the Complexity of GVC Participation Matter for Productivity and Output Growth?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(4), pages 2038-2068, August.
    17. Biswajit Banerjee & Juraj Zeman, 2022. "Determinants of global value chain participation: cross-country analysis," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 59-95, June.
    18. Marta Solaz Alamá, 2016. "Cadenas globales de valor y generación de valor añadido: El caso de la economía española," Working Papers. Serie EC 2016-01, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    19. Michael Peneder & Gerhard Streicher, 2016. "De- versus Re-industrialisation: Is Structural Change Reversible?," WIFO Working Papers 506, WIFO.
    20. Jona-Lasinio, Cecilia & Manzocchi, Stefano & Meliciani, Valentina, 2019. "Knowledge based capital and value creation in global supply chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:119:y:2020:i:c:s1389934120302999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.