IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v23y2005i4p439-449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quo Vadis, Automotive Industry? A Vision of Possible Industry Transformations

Author

Listed:
  • Seidel, Markus
  • Loch, Christoph H.
  • Chahil, Satjiv

Abstract

The automotive industry has reached a mature state, as is evidenced by its growth and by the nature of competition (cost, speed, variants, a rush into a few growing regions and segments), and industry consolidation. In parallel, technical progress continues to be dynamic. In this paper, we examine how the automotive industry might evolve in the long term. In the foreseeable future, current trends will likely continue toward a highly competitive consumer products industry, with increasing features driven by electronics. In this base scenario the "autobahn" will merge with the "infobahn", accompanied by possible market entry by software or electronics players, and a battle for dominance over the technology platform (which will have to be shared across car makers). Car makers will have to seek avenues for differentiation, for which we see three fundamental new business opportunities: The tailored car: Driven by production technology enablers, cars will be custom-made, not only by mixing and matching standard components, but by actually customizing the shape and style of components. And this at prices comparable to those of today. Brand Worlds: Car manufacturers extend their brands to other consumer product categories, attempting to "immerse" consumers in a "total brand experience" that includes, among others, financial, lifestyle, entertainment, and communication products. Multiple Transportation Modes: Cars will extend other modes of individual transportation, such as water (boat-car), air (flying car), etc. This would imply entering other industries and creating new variants of those industries. We offer a framework for proposing those scenarios. For each, we discuss technology drivers, current early indicators, economics, and supply chain implications (such as industry complexity). We conclude by evaluating the need for managers today to pursue not only the (inevitable) base case but also one or several of the three opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Seidel, Markus & Loch, Christoph H. & Chahil, Satjiv, 2005. "Quo Vadis, Automotive Industry? A Vision of Possible Industry Transformations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 439-449, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:23:y:2005:i:4:p:439-449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237305000757
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ulrich Lichtenthaler, 2017. "Shared Value Innovation: Linking Competitiveness and Societal Goals in the Context of Digital Transformation," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Antonino Vaccaro & Stefano Brusoni & Francisco M. Veloso, 2011. "Virtual Design, Problem Framing, and Innovation: An Empirical Study in the Automotive Industry," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 99-122, January.
    3. Cohen, Maurie J., 2010. "Destination unknown: Pursuing sustainable mobility in the face of rival societal aspirations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 459-470, May.
    4. Xenias, Dimitrios & Whitmarsh, Lorraine, 2013. "Dimensions and determinants of expert and public attitudes to sustainable transport policies and technologies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 75-85.
    5. Ainhoa Serna & Aitor Soroa & Rodrigo Agerri, 2021. "Applying Deep Learning Techniques for Sentiment Analysis to Assess Sustainable Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:23:y:2005:i:4:p:439-449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.