IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v18y2000i5p511-518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BP Amoco: integrating competitive and financial strategy: Part Two: financial strategy and valuation measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Stonham, Paul

Abstract

Part Two of this Case Study of BP Amoco examines the rôle of finance and financial strategy in BP Amoco between 1990 and 2000 to see where and how far they were supportive and complementary to competitive strategies pursued by the company's senior managers, and if they were ever pro-active. Models of value creation by Damodaran and Rappaport are considered as generic background and the relationship between financial strategies and performance and competitive strategies examined by using a sample of ratios suggested by McKenzie. Part Two concludes with valuation of BP Amoco, applying several metrics: total returns, asset value, earnings multiples and discounted cash flows (specifically, economic value added).

Suggested Citation

  • Stonham, Paul, 2000. "BP Amoco: integrating competitive and financial strategy: Part Two: financial strategy and valuation measurement," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 511-518, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:18:y:2000:i:5:p:511-518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237300000402
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chaiyapa, Warathida & Esteban, Miguel & Kameyama, Yasuko, 2018. "Why go green? Discourse analysis of motivations for Thailand's oil and gas companies to invest in renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 448-459.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:18:y:2000:i:5:p:511-518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.