IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v74y2019icp76-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the factors that influence health promotion evaluation: The development and validation of the evaluation practice analysis survey

Author

Listed:
  • Schwarzman, Joanna
  • Bauman, Adrian
  • Gabbe, Belinda J.
  • Rissel, Chris
  • Shilton, Trevor
  • Smith, Ben J.

Abstract

The demand for improved quality of health promotion evaluation and greater capacity to undertake evaluation is growing, yet evidence of the challenges and facilitators to evaluation practice within the health promotion field is lacking. A limited number of evaluation capacity measurement instruments have been validated in government or non-government organisations (NGO), however there is no instrument designed for health promotion organisations. This study aimed to develop and validate an Evaluation Practice Analysis Survey (EPAS) to examine evaluation practices in health promotion organisations. Qualitative interviews, existing frameworks and instruments informed the survey development. Health promotion practitioners from government agencies and NGOs completed the survey (n = 169). Principal components analysis was used to determine scale structure and Cronbach’s α used to estimate internal reliability. Logistic regression was conducted to assess predictive validity of selected EPAS scale. The final survey instrument included 25 scales (125 items). The EPAS demonstrated good internal reliability (α > 0.7) for 23 scales. Dedicated resources and time for evaluation, leadership, organisational culture and internal support for evaluation showed promising predictive validity. The EPAS can be used to describe elements of evaluation capacity at the individual, organisational and system levels and to guide initiatives to improve evaluation practice in health promotion organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Schwarzman, Joanna & Bauman, Adrian & Gabbe, Belinda J. & Rissel, Chris & Shilton, Trevor & Smith, Ben J., 2019. "Understanding the factors that influence health promotion evaluation: The development and validation of the evaluation practice analysis survey," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 76-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:74:y:2019:i:c:p:76-83
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.03.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718918302635
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.03.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gagnon, France & Aubry, Tim & Cousins, J. Bradley & Goh, Swee C. & Elliott, Catherine, 2018. "Validation of the evaluation capacity in organizations questionnaire," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 166-175.
    2. Lindeman, Peter T. & Bettin, Emily & Beach, Lauren B. & Adames, Christian N. & Johnson, Amy K. & Kern, Dave & Stonehouse, Patrick & Greene, George J. & Phillips, Gregory, 2018. "Evaluation capacity building—Results and reflections across two years of a multisite empowerment evaluation in an HIV prevention context," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 83-88.
    3. Huckel Schneider, Carmen & Milat, Andrew J. & Moore, Gabriel, 2016. "Barriers and facilitators to evaluation of health policies and programs: Policymaker and researcher perspectives," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 208-215.
    4. Norton, Sophie & Milat, Andrew & Edwards, Barry & Giffin, Michael, 2016. "Narrative review of strategies by organizations for building evaluation capacity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-19.
    5. Valenti, Maria & Campetti, Randi & Schoenborn, Nicole & Quinlan, Kristen & Dash, Kim, 2017. "Building evaluation capacity of local substance abuse prevention programs serving LGBQ populations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 101-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schwarzman, Joanna & Bauman, Adrian & Gabbe, Belinda J. & Rissel, Chris & Shilton, Trevor & Smith, Ben J., 2022. "How practitioner, organisational and system-level factors act to influence health promotion evaluation capacity: Validation of a conceptual framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schwarzman, Joanna & Bauman, Adrian & Gabbe, Belinda J. & Rissel, Chris & Shilton, Trevor & Smith, Ben J., 2022. "How practitioner, organisational and system-level factors act to influence health promotion evaluation capacity: Validation of a conceptual framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Kumar Chaudhary, Anil & Diaz, John & Jayaratne, K.S.U. & Assan, Elsie, 2020. "Evaluation capacity building in the nonformal education context: Challenges and strategies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Yu.V. Lyandau & I.A. Kalinina & A.P. Garnov & Y.Yu. Garnova, 2018. "Research of the Russian Companies’ Potential and the Success Factors," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special1), pages 250-260.
    4. Nielsen, Steffen Bohni & Lemire, Sebastian & Bourgeois, Isabelle & Fierro, Leslie A., 2023. "Mapping the evaluation capacity building landscape: A bibliometric analysis of scholarly communities and themes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Greene, George J. & Reidy, Emma & Felt, Dylan & Marro, Rachel & Johnson, Amy K. & Phillips, Gregory & Green, Evelyn & Stonehouse, Patrick, 2022. "Implementation and evaluation of patient navigation in Chicago: Insights on addressing the social determinants of health and integrating HIV prevention and care services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. repec:ers:journl:v:special_issue:y:2018:i:1:p:250-260 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Merritt, Eileen G. & Stern, Marc J. & Powell, Robert B. & Frensley, Brandon T., 2023. "Benefits of participation in a community of practice focused on evaluation and programmatic improvement for environmental educators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Lawarée, Justin & Jacob, Steve & Ouimet, Mathieu, 2020. "A scoping review of knowledge syntheses in the field of evaluation across four decades of practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Rubén Jesús Pérez-López & Jesús Everardo Olguín Tiznado & María Mojarro Magaña & Claudia Camargo Wilson & Juan Andrés López Barreras & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz, 2019. "Information Sharing with ICT in Production Systems and Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:74:y:2019:i:c:p:76-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.