IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v292y2024ics0360544224002342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving robustness in strategic energy planning: A novel decision support method to deal with epistemic uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Rodriguez-Matas, Antonio F.
  • Linares, Pedro
  • Perez-Bravo, Manuel
  • Romero, Jose Carlos

Abstract

This paper addresses the challenge of dealing with epistemic, i.e. non-probabilistic, uncertainties in strategic energy planning modelling. Current models have limited consideration of this type of uncertainty compared to probabilistic uncertainty, and also typically lead to overly conservative results. To address this issue, the contribution of the paper is to propose a novel decision support method which combines two decision-making methodologies into a single, internally consistent algorithm, and to show its applicability to real-size energy planning studies. Robust optimization is applied to address constraint uncertainties, while the minimax regret criterion is utilized for uncertainties in the objective function. This approach facilitates energy modelling exercises that can be more closely aligned with decision-makers' preferences for both feasibility and optimality. To demonstrate its effectiveness, the method is applied to a real-size strategic energy planning model, and the algorithm is shown to be able to provide detailed solutions in reasonable times. Ex-post evaluations confirm that this approach maintains robust optimization performance by effectively reducing the occurrence and magnitude of infeasibilities, while satisfying the minimax regret criterion across the entire range of uncertainties. Therefore, this integration preserves the distinct advantages of each methodology without any adverse effects when used together.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodriguez-Matas, Antonio F. & Linares, Pedro & Perez-Bravo, Manuel & Romero, Jose Carlos, 2024. "Improving robustness in strategic energy planning: A novel decision support method to deal with epistemic uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:292:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224002342
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224002342
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:292:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224002342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.