IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v288y2024ics0360544223033005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty quantification of reservoir performance using machine learning algorithms and structured expert judgment

Author

Listed:
  • Fathy, Mohammad
  • Kazemzadeh Haghighi, Foojan
  • Ahmadi, Mohammad

Abstract

The increasing demand for fossil energy necessitates forecasting of reservoir performance and informed decision-making under various production scenarios. Although reservoir models are used to make such forecasts, neglecting geological uncertainties and history matching can limit the understanding of reservoir production behavior. While performing reservoir simulation on multiple models for uncertainty quantification is a direct approach, it is associated with significant time and computational costs and low convergence rates. This study proposes a method to address these limitations using Bayes' theorem integrated with Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, sampling methods (Markov Chain Monte Carlo and rejection), and Structured Expert Judgment (SEJ) based on the Cooke's Model (CM). The tuned ANN model outperforms traditional simulation methods in terms of computational cost when predicting posterior probability distributions, while also displaying high accuracy as confirmed by R2-score and k-fold cross-validation analyses. Furthermore, using trained ANN models in conjunction with representative samples drawn from posterior probability distributions enables the rigorous prediction of reservoir production parameters. Finally, the CM is implemented to generate a robust model by combining the statistical quantiles, including P10–P25–P50–P75–P90 estimations obtained from MCMC and rejection sampling. The applicability of this methodology is demonstrated for Teal South reservoir with eight uncertain parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Fathy, Mohammad & Kazemzadeh Haghighi, Foojan & Ahmadi, Mohammad, 2024. "Uncertainty quantification of reservoir performance using machine learning algorithms and structured expert judgment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:288:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223033005
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223033005
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129906?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:288:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223033005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.