IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v275y2023ics0360544223007879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk profiles of scenarios for the low-carbon transition

Author

Listed:
  • Axon, C.J.
  • Darton, R.C.

Abstract

Providing energy to an economy through fuel supply chains incurs risks which can be identified and quantified by systematic analysis. Scenario analysis and risk analysis are complementary tools for assessing possible changes to socio-technical systems. Applying a risk evaluation method to published future energy scenarios shows how risk in the energy system might vary with time. In a UK case study six scenarios to 2050 are analysed, focusing on installed electricity generating capacity. Of the seven categories of risk, political risk scored the highest over the whole period. Despite the installed capacity increasing by a factor of up to three by 2050 with reductions in GHG emissions, our analysis projects a reduction in risk and shows how significantly the pathways differ. To indicate the difficulty of such an expansion of the electricity system, we propose the use of a new metric – the Scale of Challenge (SoC) – equal to the total risk score times the installed capacity. The key to achieving a low-carbon transition may lie in moderating exposure to risk. Identifying the origin and type of risk can inform policy since net-zero is not zero risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Axon, C.J. & Darton, R.C., 2023. "Risk profiles of scenarios for the low-carbon transition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:275:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223007879
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223007879
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terje Aven & Louis Anthony Cox, 2016. "National and Global Risk Studies: How Can the Field of Risk Analysis Contribute?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 186-190, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    2. Зарочинцев С. В., 2021. ""Упреждающее" Государственное Управление И Оценка Рисков Национальной Безопасности," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 3, pages 200-218.
    3. Ivano Bongiovanni & Cameron Newton, 2019. "Toward an Epidemiology of Safety and Security Risks: An Organizational Vulnerability Assessment in International Airports," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1281-1297, June.
    4. Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel & Seçil Şenel, 2018. "Analyzing the Global Risks for the Financial Crisis after the Great Depression Using Comparative Hybrid Hesitant Fuzzy Decision-Making Models: Policy Recommendations for Sustainable Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Liangdong Lu & Hong Huang & Jiuchang Wei & Jia Xu, 2020. "Safety Regulations and the Uncertainty of Work‐Related Road Accident Loss: The Triple Identity of Chinese Local Governments Under Principal–Agent Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(6), pages 1168-1182, June.
    6. Wei Wang & Francesco Di Maio & Enrico Zio, 2019. "Adversarial Risk Analysis to Allocate Optimal Defense Resources for Protecting Cyber–Physical Systems from Cyber Attacks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2766-2785, December.
    7. Terje Aven, 2018. "An Emerging New Risk Analysis Science: Foundations and Implications," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 876-888, May.
    8. Jason Thistlethwaite, 2017. "The Emergence of Flood Insurance in Canada: Navigating Institutional Uncertainty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 744-755, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:275:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223007879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.