IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v10y1985i7p851-859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic distribution distance for cogenerated district heating and cooling

Author

Listed:
  • Porter, R.W.

Abstract

There has been considerable recent interest in the U.S. concerning district heating and cooling for urban redevelopment, especially including cogeneration and incineration of refuse. We consider several options incorporating cooling, cogeneration and refuse incineration alternatives in a modular design concept. A life-cycle economic analysis is used to evaluate each alternative technology including selection of the optimum choice of cooling and cogeneration modes and to determine the justifiable distribution cost and distance. Viable technologies and sites may then be assessed by comparing justifiable and required distribution distances per unit heating capacity. An example is presented evaluating natural gas and refuse fuels, thermal and electric refrigeration for cooling, and steam turbine, gas turbine and diesel cogeneration for twelve sites in the City of Chicago. The analysis is useful for screening and evaluating both technologies and sites prior to more detailed case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Porter, R.W., 1985. "Economic distribution distance for cogenerated district heating and cooling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 10(7), pages 851-859.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:10:y:1985:i:7:p:851-859
    DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(85)90118-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0360544285901185
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0360-5442(85)90118-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:10:y:1985:i:7:p:851-859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.