IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v187y2024ics0301421524000739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What we talk about when we talk about electricity: A thematic analysis of recent political debates on Swedish electricity supply

Author

Listed:
  • Sonnsjö, Hannes

Abstract

The Swedish electricity system is undergoing a transition unprecedented in both speed and scale, thereby exposing a number of policy-related controversies. In this study, six central themes in the on-going debates around the security of electricity supply in Sweden are identified based on a material of over 1000 news articles, published between the years 2010–2022. By applying the themes to the political debates within Parliament, the analysis suggests that security of electricity supply has been a neglected aspect of the energy trilemma and that recent years have seen a dramatic increase in this regard. This development is primarily driven by geopolitical concerns and a rapidly evolving energy landscape. The role of the market and its ability to provide incentives for long-term investments has become increasingly contested following the intense reporting on ‘price shocks’. ‘lack of grid capacity’ and the increased risk of ‘manual disconnections’. The paper therefore supports the claim that Sweden, in line with several other EU-countries, are showing signs of a ‘regulatory remedy’, after an era of liberalisation. The paper concludes with a number of policy dilemmas and conflicts of goals in relation to market integration (security of supply), technology neutrality (sustainability) and adequate price signals (competitiveness).

Suggested Citation

  • Sonnsjö, Hannes, 2024. "What we talk about when we talk about electricity: A thematic analysis of recent political debates on Swedish electricity supply," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000739
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524000739
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.