IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v187y2024ics0301421524000521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The multiple benefits of current and potential energy efficiency policies: A Scottish islands case study

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew, Chris

Abstract

Energy efficiency is essential for decarbonisation targets, but quantifying its multiple benefits remains difficult given heterogeneity of technologies, stakeholders, and interactions. This study uses a 100%-sample, hourly model to estimate electricity demand and economics for the Scottish islands by 2045. Scenarios of current and more ambitious policies for appliances, buildings, heating, transport and industry are compared. The framework allows assessment of annual demand, peak demand, and average household bills changes which could either increase or decrease depending on policy commitment. Although improving building efficiency can contribute, heat pumps have by far the greatest benefit in reducing bills, annual demand, and peak demand (both daily and maximum winter demand). Increased peak heating and vehicle demand highlights the importance of flexibility. Historic rates of policy achievement will result in significantly increased electricity demand, which could further stress already constrained networks. Although upfront costs are high, most measures have favourable rates of return and all have positive NPVs relative to current electricity prices. Policies to support these costs and distribute the benefits to households, businesses and the energy system will be crucial. As the model only considers changes in technologies, results are likely optimistic given potential rebound effects which could increase demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew, Chris, 2024. "The multiple benefits of current and potential energy efficiency policies: A Scottish islands case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000521
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524000521
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.