IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v187y2024ics030142152400048x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Early evidence of a transition towards sustainability-oriented decision-making in the chemical industry in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: A choice-based conjoint analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Heck, Janine
  • Jahnke, Lars
  • Leker, Jens

Abstract

The chemical industry faces the challenge of moving from a predominantly cost-based model to one that integrates green and sustainable practices. This study seeks to understand the evolving priorities of decision-makers in this sector. Specifically, it is examined how they weigh the importance of four criteria: the importance of a renewable energy mix, the energy price, investments in production plants, and the uncertainty over political regulation, including both CO2 pricing and carbon leakage protection. By applying a choice-based conjoint analysis with 102 participants from the DACH region, comprising Germany (D), Austria (A), and Switzerland (CH) in the fall of 2022, different decision patterns were identified. While cost considerations continue to play a central role, sustainability aspects are becoming increasingly important in decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Heck, Janine & Jahnke, Lars & Leker, Jens, 2024. "Early evidence of a transition towards sustainability-oriented decision-making in the chemical industry in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: A choice-based conjoint analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s030142152400048x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152400048X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s030142152400048x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.