IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v187y2024ics0301421524000466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gas power — How much is needed on the road to carbon neutrality?

Author

Listed:
  • Scharf, Hendrik
  • Möst, Dominik

Abstract

The national and international expansion of renewable energy and the retirement of conventional capacity are increasing the challenge of ensuring generation adequacy in the European power system. New gas-fired power plants have been perceived as a promising option to secure supply. However, recent geopolitical developments have raised concerns about the high dependence on natural gas. This paper explores how different scenarios of power consumption and renewable energy targets in Germany determine the reliance on gas-fired power generation capacity in 2030, 2040, and 2050. Using the electricity market model ELTRAMOD it examines the effects of the different scenario assumptions on gas-fired capacity and generation, renewable capacity, electricity trade, and greenhouse gas emissions in Germany and abroad. The results demonstrate a clear need for reliable capacity in the future, with gas-fired capacity accounting for the largest share. In all scenarios analyzed, Europe’s dependence on natural gas increases from historical levels until 2030 and then falls only slightly below historical levels until 2040. Stricter German renewable energy targets shift natural gas use from Germany to other European countries. Phasing out coal in Germany before 2030 instead of in 2038 makes Germany dependent on reliable capacity from abroad and increases its reliance on natural gas.

Suggested Citation

  • Scharf, Hendrik & Möst, Dominik, 2024. "Gas power — How much is needed on the road to carbon neutrality?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000466
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524000466
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.