IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v185y2024ics0301421523005165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the merit-order effect using coarsened exact matching: Reconciling theory with the empirical results to improve policy implications

Author

Listed:
  • Rinne, Sonja

Abstract

Does the merit-order effect vary between renewable technologies? The theory behind the effect predicts the same right shift in the supply curve from solar as from wind electricity, which means no. However, many empirical studies suggest yes. A clear answer to this question is important for policymakers to design suitable policy instruments to promote renewable electricity. This study reconciles the theory of the merit-order effect with the empirical results using a quasi-experimental approach. Coarsened exact matching is applied in order to estimate the merit-order effect for solar and wind electricity generation and the results indicate that when using this thorough identification strategy, there is no empirical evidence for a difference in the merit-order effect between solar and wind electricity generation. To this end, different merit-order effects of solar and wind electricity will originate from interactions with other variable in the electricity system. Therefore, empirical studies need to carefully disentangle the effects of these variables in order to provide useful and reliable insights for policymakers and financial stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Rinne, Sonja, 2024. "Estimating the merit-order effect using coarsened exact matching: Reconciling theory with the empirical results to improve policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523005165
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421523005165
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523005165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.