IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v181y2023ics0301421523003038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unintended mitigation benefits of China's coal de-capacity policies on methane emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Jinling
  • Gao, Junlian
  • Yan, Kejia
  • Zhang, Bo

Abstract

Coal de-capacity policies are often used to promote the integration of coal resources and optimize the production structure in China. This study used a bottom-up approach to evaluate the unintended effect of China's coal de-capacity policies on methane emissions mitigation from 2011 to 2019. Under the effect of such policies, the closed coal capacity was 46% of the total coal capacity in 2011. A total of 9567 coal mines with 1610 Mt of capacity were closed. The capacity of low CH4-content coal mines accounted for 77% in 2019, and the capacity of high and outburst CH4-content coal mines decreased by 9% compared to 2011. The adjustment in coal production structure in turn affects coal mine methane emission intensity, hence the national average coal mine emission factor decreased from 9 m3/t in 2011 to 8 m3/t in 2019. The coal de-capacity policies generated a cumulative 10.70 Tg of methane emissions mitigation from 2011 to 2019, even with rebounded coal production. As the number of coal mine closures continues to increase, the priority phase-out of high and outburst CH4-content mines will further lead to greater methane mitigation. In the future, more attention should be paid to methane emissions from abandoned mines.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Jinling & Gao, Junlian & Yan, Kejia & Zhang, Bo, 2023. "Unintended mitigation benefits of China's coal de-capacity policies on methane emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:181:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523003038
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421523003038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113718?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:181:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523003038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.