IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v129y2024ics0140988323007740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate ESG rating divergence and excess stock returns

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Haijun
  • Jiao, Shuaipeng
  • Ge, Chen
  • Sun, Guanglin

Abstract

ESG rating have progressively become an important reference index within the investment decision-making process. However, divergence might arise among diverse ESG rating agencies when appraising the same company. Such divergence affects investors' perception of a companies' ESG performance, consequently affecting its excess stock returns. This paper delves into the mechanics behind ESG rating divergence on excess stock returns based on the ESG rating data encompassing Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies in China spanning from 2018 to 2022. The research reveals the following findings: Firstly, ESG rating divergence negatively impact stock excess return rates. Investor sentiment, ESG improvement potential and information transparency play a positive moderating role in the influence of ESG rating divergence on excess stock returns. Secondly, there are heterogeneity characteristics in the impact of ESG rating divergence on excess stock returns. Companies that actively disclose ESG reports, low-carbon companies, companies with QFII, and those with high divergence and high rating experience a greater impact form ESG rating divergence on their excess stock returns. Thirdly, the social rating divergence has the greatest impact on excess stock returns, followed by environmental and governance levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Haijun & Jiao, Shuaipeng & Ge, Chen & Sun, Guanglin, 2024. "Corporate ESG rating divergence and excess stock returns," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007740
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323007740
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ESG rating divergence; Excess stock returns; Investor sentiment; ESG improvement potential; Information transparency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.