IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v129y2024ics0140988323007739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How carbon risk affects corporate debt defaults: Evidence from Paris agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jiaxin
  • Qiang, Haofan
  • Liang, Yuchao
  • Huang, Xiang
  • Zhong, Wenrui

Abstract

There is an increasing concern in traditional energy industries (e.g., oil and coal) due to the high carbon emissions they produce. In an attempt to achieve carbon emission reduction, governments have launched various policies to restrict the use of fossil energy sources. While carbon regulation aims to encourage high‑carbon firms to accelerate their green governance transition, the carbon risk hypothesis argues that these instruments may raise compliance costs and the risk of financial default for the firms. This paper uses the exogenous shock of China's accession to the Paris Agreement as an identification strategy to test the relationship between carbon risk and corporate debt default. We find that the risk of debt default for high‑carbon firms decreases significantly after carbon regulation compared to low-carbon firms. Promoting green transformation, reducing financial leverage, and increasing legal compliance are proven to be three crucial mechanisms. Further analysis shows that this effect is heterogeneity between the different levels of government environmental governance pressure, financial market attention, industry competitive pressure, and media scrutiny. Our study provides novel evidence for promoting sustainable development in the conventional energy industries represented by oil through environmental regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jiaxin & Qiang, Haofan & Liang, Yuchao & Huang, Xiang & Zhong, Wenrui, 2024. "How carbon risk affects corporate debt defaults: Evidence from Paris agreement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007739
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323007739
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.