IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v129y2024ics0140988323007594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing systemic risk and connectedness among dirty and clean energy markets from the quantile and expectile perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Syuhada, Khreshna
  • Hakim, Arief
  • Suprijanto, Djoko

Abstract

In response to environmental and climate change issues in recent decades, clean energy resources have been promoted as substitutes for fossil fuel-based dirty energy resources. While receiving great attention from environmentally conscious investors and policy-makers, the markets for the former energies could be affected by financial instability in the markets for the latter, which could lead to systemic risk and directional connectedness. In this paper, we aimed to assess potential systemic risk in such markets by employing conditional quantile- and conditional expectile-based Value-at-Risk (henceforth CoVaR and CoEVaR, respectively). Due to their definition through expected conditional asymmetric loss functions, we adopted Kabaila’s efficient method for the computation of conditional expectations and proposed a backtesting technique based on Diebold and Mariano’s test. Using Delta-CoVaR and Delta-CoEVaR, we constructed conditional tail risk networks to describe the directional tail risk connectedness. We revealed that the CoVaR and CoEVaR for almost all pairs of energy markets had the best forecast accuracy when computed using a copula exhibiting symmetric tail dependence with asymmetric and heavy-tailed margins. Compared to CoVaR, CoEVaR possessed a relatively better conditional coverage performance in several cases, complementing its advantage of being more sensitive to (extreme) loss magnitude. In addition, we found crude oil, heating oil, and sectoral clean energy indices to be highly interconnected, but the connectedness weakened following the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. In particular, crude oil and the renewable energy sector played a consistent role as the most systemically important net receiver and net transmitter, respectively. These results provided important implications for policy-makers and investors aware of systemic risk and connectedness among dirty and clean energy markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Syuhada, Khreshna & Hakim, Arief & Suprijanto, Djoko, 2024. "Assessing systemic risk and connectedness among dirty and clean energy markets from the quantile and expectile perspectives," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007594
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323007594
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Clean energy; Paris Agreement; Conditional Value-at-Risk; Backtesting; Tail dependence; Tail risk connectedness network;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q47 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy Forecasting
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.