IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v129y2024ics0140988323007363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental bonuses of employment protection: Evidence from labor contract law in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shangguan, Yiwen
  • Feng, Qiyangfan

Abstract

Although it has been verified that employment protection can bring multiple impacts on firms, few studies have investigated whether and how employment protection affects firm emission decisions. Utilizing a dataset of Chinese industrial firms from 2002 to 2011 and the implementation of China's Labor Contract Law (LCL), we employed a difference-in-differences model to investigate the effect of the employment protection on firm's emissions behaviors. Our empirical results show that firms with higher labor intensity significantly reduce their SO2 emission intensity following the implementation of the law. This result withstood a series of robustness tests. We investigate three potential channels: pollutant treatment, energy use, and green innovation. The findings confirmed that firms can reduce the cost of employment protection by increasing their energy efficiency and the intensity of their clean energy inputs. Furthermore, the LCL's impact was notably pronounced in firms with foreign capital, and those characterized by higher profitability and productivity. Our study seems to confirm that firms do not shift their financial pressure by increasing their emissions behavior, instead, employment protection produces environmental bonuses.

Suggested Citation

  • Shangguan, Yiwen & Feng, Qiyangfan, 2024. "Environmental bonuses of employment protection: Evidence from labor contract law in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007363
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323007363
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.