IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v128y2023ics0140988323006679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What has the strongest connectedness with clean energy? Technology, substitutes, or raw materials

Author

Listed:
  • Su, Xianfang
  • Zhao, Yachao

Abstract

This paper examines the connectedness of clean energy with technology, substitutes (crude oil and natural gas), and raw materials (silver, platinum, copper, corn, and soybean). This is conducted from a systemic perspective, using the quantile time–frequency connectedness approach. The results reveal that clean energy and technology stocks demonstrate the strongest pairwise connectedness across all quantile levels in the short, medium, and long terms. Meanwhile, fossil energy commodities (as substitutes) and metal and agricultural commodities (as raw materials) exhibit relatively intensive connectedness, with clean energy stocks only at the lower and upper quantiles in the short term. Furthermore, connectedness among the markets under examination is significantly enhanced during periods of financial turmoil, as was the case during the European debt crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, the minimum connectedness portfolio analysis indicates that natural gas futures offer the highest hedge effectiveness, and technology stocks offer the lowest hedge effectiveness across frequencies and quantiles. This finding suggests that optimal portfolios will have a larger proportion of natural gas futures. These findings have significant implications for both investors and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Su, Xianfang & Zhao, Yachao, 2023. "What has the strongest connectedness with clean energy? Technology, substitutes, or raw materials," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:128:y:2023:i:c:s0140988323006679
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323006679
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:128:y:2023:i:c:s0140988323006679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.