IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v128y2023ics014098832300436x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between climate protection activities, economic preferences, and life satisfaction: Empirical evidence for Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Haverkamp, Thilo K.G.
  • Welsch, Heinz
  • Ziegler, Andreas

Abstract

Based on widely representative data for 1614 citizens in Germany, this paper empirically examines the relationship between different types of environmental protection activities and subjective well-being (SWB) in terms of life satisfaction by specifically considering the role of economic preferences for this relationship. With respect to pro-environmental behavior, we distinguish between stated environmental protection activities and revealed pro-environmental behavior in terms of climate protection activities, which are measured with an incentivized donation scheme. Our empirical analysis reveals that not only stated environmental protection activities (contributing more or less to climate protection), but also more reliable revealed climate protection activities are significantly positively correlated with life satisfaction. Furthermore, economic preferences play an important role since risk-taking preferences, patience, and trust are significantly positively correlated with life satisfaction. In particular, the estimated correlations between environmental protection activities and life satisfaction become weaker when economic preferences are included in the econometric analysis. These results strongly suggest omitted variable bias in cross-sectional econometric analyses of the relationship between pro-environmental behavior and SWB when economic preferences are not included as control variables. With respect to the distinction between different groups of (stated) environmental protection activities, our empirical analysis also shows that (electricity-related) direct climate protection activities and costly environmental protection activities are more positively correlated with life satisfaction than less costly or non-costly general environmental protection activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Haverkamp, Thilo K.G. & Welsch, Heinz & Ziegler, Andreas, 2023. "The relationship between climate protection activities, economic preferences, and life satisfaction: Empirical evidence for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:128:y:2023:i:c:s014098832300436x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832300436X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Subjective well-being; Life satisfaction; Climate protection activities; Incentivized donation experiment; Economic preferences;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:128:y:2023:i:c:s014098832300436x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.