IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v191y2008i3p838-854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of general semi-infinite programming to lapidary cutting problems

Author

Listed:
  • Winterfeld, Anton

Abstract

We consider a volume maximization problem arising in gemstone cutting industry. The problem is formulated as a general semi-infinite program (GSIP) and solved using an interior-point method developed by Stein [O. Stein, Bi-level Strategies in Semi-infinite Programming, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2003]. It is shown, that the convexity assumption needed for the convergence of the algorithm can be satisfied by appropriate modelling. Clustering techniques are used to reduce the number of container constraints, which is necessary to make the subproblems practically tractable. An iterative process consisting of GSIP optimization and adaptive refinement steps is then employed to obtain an optimal solution which is also feasible for the original problem. Some numerical results based on real-world data are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Winterfeld, Anton, 2008. "Application of general semi-infinite programming to lapidary cutting problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 838-854, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:191:y:2008:i:3:p:838-854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(07)00432-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gui-Hua Lin & Masao Fukushima, 2005. "A Modified Relaxation Scheme for Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 63-84, January.
    2. Holger Scheel & Stefan Scholtes, 2000. "Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints: Stationarity, Optimality, and Sensitivity," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 1-22, February.
    3. David F. Rogers & Robert D. Plante & Richard T. Wong & James R. Evans, 1991. "Aggregation and Disaggregation Techniques and Methodology in Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 553-582, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stuart M. Harwood & Paul I. Barton, 2017. "How to solve a design centering problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 86(1), pages 215-254, August.
    2. Jan Schwientek & Tobias Seidel & Karl-Heinz Küfer, 2021. "A transformation-based discretization method for solving general semi-infinite optimization problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 93(1), pages 83-114, February.
    3. Stein, Oliver, 2012. "How to solve a semi-infinite optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 312-320.
    4. Volker Maag, 2015. "A collision detection approach for maximizing the material utilization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 761-781, July.
    5. Daniel Jungen & Hatim Djelassi & Alexander Mitsos, 2022. "Adaptive discretization-based algorithms for semi-infinite programs with unbounded variables," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 96(1), pages 83-112, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giandomenico Mastroeni & Letizia Pellegrini & Alberto Peretti, 2021. "Some numerical aspects on a method for solving linear problems with complementarity constraints," Working Papers 16/2021, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    2. Christian Kanzow & Alexandra Schwartz, 2015. "The Price of Inexactness: Convergence Properties of Relaxation Methods for Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints Revisited," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 253-275, February.
    3. H. Z. Luo & X. L. Sun & Y. F. Xu, 2010. "Convergence Properties of Modified and Partially-Augmented Lagrangian Methods for Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 489-506, June.
    4. Jean-Pierre Dussault & Mounir Haddou & Abdeslam Kadrani & Tangi Migot, 2020. "On Approximate Stationary Points of the Regularized Mathematical Program with Complementarity Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 186(2), pages 504-522, August.
    5. Hoai An Thi & Thi Minh Tam Nguyen & Tao Pham Dinh, 2023. "On solving difference of convex functions programs with linear complementarity constraints," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 163-197, September.
    6. Meng Xu & Guangmin Wang & Susan Grant-Muller & Ziyou Gao, 2017. "Joint road toll pricing and capacity development in discrete transport network design problem," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 731-752, July.
    7. Suhong Jiang & Jin Zhang & Caihua Chen & Guihua Lin, 2018. "Smoothing partial exact penalty splitting method for mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 223-236, January.
    8. Lei Guo & Gui-Hua Lin & Jane J. Ye, 2013. "Second-Order Optimality Conditions for Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 33-64, July.
    9. Gemayqzel Bouza & Georg Still, 2007. "Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints: Convergence Properties of a Smoothing Method," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 467-483, May.
    10. O. Stein & A. Winterfeld, 2010. "Feasible Method for Generalized Semi-Infinite Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 419-443, August.
    11. Christian Kanzow & Alexandra Schwartz, 2014. "Convergence properties of the inexact Lin-Fukushima relaxation method for mathematical programs with complementarity constraints," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 249-262, October.
    12. Na Xu & Xide Zhu & Li-Ping Pang & Jian Lv, 2018. "Improved Convergence Properties of the Relaxation Schemes of Kadrani et al. and Kanzow and Schwartz for MPEC," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(01), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Richard Connors & David Watling, 2015. "Assessing the Demand Vulnerability of Equilibrium Traffic Networks via Network Aggregation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 367-395, June.
    14. Stefan Scholtes, 2004. "Nonconvex Structures in Nonlinear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 368-383, June.
    15. Merrick, James H. & Weyant, John P., 2019. "On choosing the resolution of normative models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 511-523.
    16. Stein, Oliver, 2012. "How to solve a semi-infinite optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 312-320.
    17. Wilhelm, Wilbert E. & Xu, Kaihong, 2002. "Prescribing product upgrades, prices and production levels over time in a stochastic environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 601-621, May.
    18. Vicens, E. & Alemany, M. E. & Andres, C. & Guarch, J. J., 2001. "A design and application methodology for hierarchical production planning decision support systems in an enterprise integration context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-3), pages 5-20, December.
    19. James H. Merrick & John E. T. Bistline & Geoffrey J. Blanford, 2021. "On representation of energy storage in electricity planning models," Papers 2105.03707, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    20. Kenneth Carling & Mengjie Han & Johan Håkansson, 2012. "Does Euclidean distance work well when the p-median model is applied in rural areas?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 83-97, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:191:y:2008:i:3:p:838-854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.