IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v191y2008i2p374-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A general repeat inspection plan for dependent multicharacteristic critical components

Author

Listed:
  • Duffuaa, S.O.
  • Khan, Mehmood

Abstract

A component is critical if it causes disaster or a very high cost upon failure. Multicharacteristic critical components exist in many systems. Such components could be a part of an aircraft, space shuttle, a special weapon system or a gas ignition system. In many situations, characteristics' failures of these components are statistically dependent. In this paper, a new inspection plan for such components is proposed. A mathematical model that depicts the plan is developed and an example demonstrating the results of the model is given. The advantage of this model over the other model where independence of the characteristics' failure is assumed for the case of dependency is illustrated. The model resulted in an average of 32.4% reduction in cost compared to the situation where the dependency case is solved assuming statistical independence.

Suggested Citation

  • Duffuaa, S.O. & Khan, Mehmood, 2008. "A general repeat inspection plan for dependent multicharacteristic critical components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 374-385, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:191:y:2008:i:2:p:374-385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(07)00286-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S O Duffuaa & M Khan, 2002. "An optimal repeat inspection plan with several classifications," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(9), pages 1016-1026, September.
    2. Hong, Sung Hoon & Kim, Sang Boo & Kwon, Hyuck Moo & Lee, Min Koo, 1998. "Economic design of screening procedures when the rejected items are reprocessed," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 65-73, July.
    3. A T Brint, 2000. "Sequential inspection sampling to avoid failure critical items being in an at risk condition," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(9), pages 1051-1059, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chun, Young H., 2016. "Designing repetitive screening procedures with imperfect inspections: An empirical Bayes approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 639-647.
    2. Muhammad Babar Ramzan & Shehreyar Mohsin Qureshi & Sonia Irshad Mari & Muhammad Saad Memon & Mandeep Mittal & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Waqas Iqbal, 2019. "Effect of Time-Varying Factors on Optimal Combination of Quality Inspectors for Offline Inspection Station," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    2. Bimal Kumar Sett & Bikash Koli Dey & Biswajit Sarkar, 2020. "Autonomated Inspection Policy for Smart Factory—An Improved Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Altay, Nezih & Green III, Walter G., 2006. "OR/MS research in disaster operations management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 475-493, November.
    4. Khan, Mehmood & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2011. "An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 113-118, September.
    5. R. Patro & Mitali M. Nayak & M. Acharya, 2019. "An EOQ model for fuzzy defective rate with allowable proportionate discount," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(1), pages 191-215, March.
    6. Mehmood Khan & Matloub Hussain & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, 2017. "Learning and screening errors in an EPQ inventory model for supply chains with stochastic lead time demands," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4816-4832, August.
    7. Bendavid, Illana & Herer, Yale T., 2009. "Economic optimization of off-line inspection in a process that also produces non-conforming units when in control and conforming units when out of control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 139-155, May.
    8. Cui, L. R. & Loh, H. T. & Xie, M., 2004. "Sequential inspection strategy for multiple systems under availability requirement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 170-177, May.
    9. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Jamal, A.M.M. & Mondal, Sanjay, 2008. "Optimal batch sizing in a multi-stage production system with rework consideration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 915-929, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:191:y:2008:i:2:p:374-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.