IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eejocm/v50y2024ics1755534524000058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Travel behaviour and game theory: A review of route choice modeling behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad, Furkan
  • Al-Fagih, Luluwah

Abstract

Route choice models are a vital tool for evaluating the impact of transportation policies and infrastructure improvements, such as the addition of new roads, tolls, or congestion charges. They can also be used to predict traffic flow and congestion levels, which is essential for traffic management and control. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness and limitations of various game theory (GT) based models used in route choice modelling. The manuscript draws upon the theoretical foundations of game theory to explore the complex decision-making processes of travelers in transportation networks, focusing on factors such as travel time, congestion. The manuscript discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with implementing game theory-based models in practice, including the data requirements, model calibration, and computational complexity. These factors are considered in relation to the suitability of different game theory-based models, including cooperative, non-cooperative, and evolutionary games. The comparative critiques presented in this manuscript provide guidance for future research directions in the field of private route choice modelling, aimed at academic researchers, engineers, policymakers, and industrial communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad, Furkan & Al-Fagih, Luluwah, 2024. "Travel behaviour and game theory: A review of route choice modeling behaviour," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:50:y:2024:i:c:s1755534524000058
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534524000058
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:50:y:2024:i:c:s1755534524000058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-choice-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.