IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v488y2024ics0304380023003095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value of ecosystem services in arid and semi-arid regions: A multi-scenario analysis of land use simulation in the Kashgar region of Xinjiang

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Ruhao
  • Fan, Yanmin
  • Wu, Hongqi
  • Zheng, Kai
  • Fan, Jie
  • Liu, Zhuo
  • Xuan, Junwei
  • Zhou, Jien

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the interrelationships between land use/land cover (LULC) and ecosystem services value (ESV) in arid and semi-arid regions, with a specific focus on the Kashgar region in Xinjiang, China. Four distinct development patterns (BAU, RED, ELP, and EBB) were derived using a multi-objective planning algorithm (MOP), and the relationship between LULC and ESV was analyzed using three methods: the random forest algorithm, the PLUS model, and the ecosystem service equivalence method. The findings indicated a significant projected expansion of LULC in Kashgar by 2030, primarily concentrated in arable and construction land. The ELP scenario demonstrated the lowest growth in cultivated and urbanized land, while the BAU and RED scenarios exhibited higher increments. Notably, the expansion of arable and construction land was concentrated around the urban agglomeration of the Kashgar region, whereas changes in forest land were concentrated near the Kunlun Mountains. Regarding ESV, grassland and watersheds played a significant role, accounting for 45 % and 30 % of the total, grasslands and watersheds emerge as pivotal components in supporting biodiversity, soil preservation, water regulation, and purification. The study underscores the necessity of conserving these ecosystems. This study highlights the trade-offs between economic development and ecological/environmental protection. The RED scenario, driven by rapid economic growth and urbanization, has resulted in a significant decline in ESVs, underscoring the urgency of sustainable land use practices. The MOP-PLUS-ESV model used in this study provides a powerful framework for decision makers to make informed choices in land use planning. By prioritizing a balance between economic development and ecological preservation, the model contributes to sustainable community and regional growth, emphasizing the preservation of important ecosystems. The findings suggest that Kashgar needs to adopt a sustainable land use strategy that balances economic development and ecological/environmental protection to maximize the provision and protection of ESV. The pathway emphasizes the integrated consideration of ESV, rational land use policies, and enhanced ecological protection to achieve an ecological civilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Ruhao & Fan, Yanmin & Wu, Hongqi & Zheng, Kai & Fan, Jie & Liu, Zhuo & Xuan, Junwei & Zhou, Jien, 2024. "The value of ecosystem services in arid and semi-arid regions: A multi-scenario analysis of land use simulation in the Kashgar region of Xinjiang," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:488:y:2024:i:c:s0304380023003095
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023003095
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Acharya, Ram Prasad & Maraseni, Tek & Cockfield, Geoff, 2019. "Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation – An analysis of publications," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    2. Hassan Mahmoudzadeh & Asghar Abedini & Farshid Aram, 2022. "Urban Growth Modeling and Land-Use/Land-Cover Change Analysis in a Metropolitan Area (Case Study: Tabriz)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Costanza, Robert & d'Arge, Ralph & de Groot, Rudolf & Farber, Stephen & Grasso, Monica & Hannon, Bruce & Limburg, Karin & Naeem, Shahid & O'Neill, Robert V. & Paruelo, Jose, 1998. "The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 3-15, April.
    4. Ze Zhou & Bin Quan & Zhiwei Deng, 2023. "Effects of Land Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in Xiangjiang River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Cao, Shaojia & Li, Chen & Cao, Shuhua & Peng, Zhe & Yang, Lingli, 2013. "Change in Ecosystem Service Value Arising from Land Consolidation Planning in Anhui Province," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 5(01), pages 1-4, January.
    6. Yuanyuan Lou & Dan Yang & Pengyan Zhang & Ying Zhang & Meiling Song & Yicheng Huang & Wenlong Jing, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use Changes with Ecosystem Service Value in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Wanxu Chen & Guangqing Chi & Jiangfeng Li, 2020. "Ecosystem Services and Their Driving Forces in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Xiaoyan Zhang & Juqin Shen & Fuhua Sun & Shou Wang & Yu Wan, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Driving Force Analysis of the Ecosystem Service Value: A Typical Case Study of the Coastal Zone, Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Chandra Prakash Morya & Milap Punia, 2022. "Impact of urbanization processes on availability of ecosystem services in National Capital Region of Delhi (1992–2010)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 7324-7348, May.
    10. Xuemao Zhang & Binggeng Xie & Junhan Li & Chuan Yuan, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Driving Force Analysis of the Ecosystem Service Value in the Fujiang River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Zhou & Tao Chen & Jingjing Wang & Xiaolan Xu, 2023. "Analyzing the Factors Driving the Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in the Liangzi Lake Basin—A GeoDetector-Based Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. van der Hoff, Richard & Nascimento, Nathália & Fabrício-Neto, Ailton & Jaramillo-Giraldo, Carolina & Ambrosio, Geanderson & Arieira, Julia & Afonso Nobre, Carlos & Rajão, Raoni, 2022. "Policy-oriented ecosystem services research on tropical forests in South America: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Márquez, Laura Andreina Matos & Rezende, Eva Caroline Nunes & Machado, Karine Borges & Nascimento, Emilly Layne Martins do & Castro, Joana D'arc Bardella & Nabout, João Carlos, 2023. "Trends in valuation approaches for cultural ecosystem services: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Taye, Fitalew Agimass & Folkersen, Maja Vinde & Fleming, Christopher M. & Buckwell, Andrew & Mackey, Brendan & Diwakar, K.C. & Le, Dung & Hasan, Syezlin & Ange, Chantal Saint, 2021. "The economic values of global forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Marini Govigli, V. & Bruzzese, S., 2023. "Assessing the emotional and spiritual dimension of forests: A review of existing participatory methods," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Hui Li & Qingchun Guan & Yanguo Fan & Chengyang Guan, 2024. "Ecosystem Service Value Assessment of the Yellow River Delta Based on Satellite Remote Sensing Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Xin Fan & Haoran Yu & Damien Sinonmatohou Tiando & Yuejing Rong & Wenxu Luo & Chan Eme & Shengya Ou & Jiangfeng Li & Zhe Liang, 2021. "Impacts of Human Activities on Ecosystem Service Value in Arid and Semi-Arid Ecological Regions of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Frings, Oliver & Abildtrup, Jens & Montagné-Huck, Claire & Gorel, Salomé & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Do individual PES buyers care about additionality and free-riding? A choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    10. Hendrawan, Dienda C P & Musshoff, Oliver, 2022. "Oil Palm Smallholder Farmers' Livelihood Resilience and Decision Making in Replanting," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322441, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Evans, Nicole M. & Carrozzino-Lyon, Amy L. & Galbraith, Betsy & Noordyk, Julia & Peroff, Deidre M. & Stoll, John & Thompson, Aaron & Winden, Matthew W. & Davis, Mark A., 2019. "Integrated ecosystem service assessment for landscape conservation design in the Green Bay watershed, Wisconsin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    12. Desbureaux, Sébastien & Brimont, Laura, 2015. "Between economic loss and social identity: The multi-dimensional cost of avoiding deforestation in Eastern Madagascar," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 10-20.
    13. Shrestha, Ram K. & Seidl, Andrew F. & Moraes, Andre S., 2002. "Value of recreational fishing in the Brazilian Pantanal: a travel cost analysis using count data models," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 289-299, August.
    14. Xiaowei Yao & Ting Luo & Yingjun Xu & Wanxu Chen & Jie Zeng, 2022. "Prediction of Spatiotemporal Changes in Sloping Cropland in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Region under Different Scenarios," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Guo, Jianke & Dong, Mengru & Zheng, Miaozhuang & Han, Zenglin & Li, Fujia, 2023. "The composition and evaluation of the strategic value of high seas resources: A theoretical model based on the human–sea relationship," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Sangha, Kamaljit K & Evans, Jay & Edwards, Andrew & Russell-Smith, Jeremy & Fisher, Rohan & Yates, Cameron & Costanza, Robert, 2021. "Assessing the value of ecosystem services delivered by prescribed fire management in Australian tropical savannas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    17. Dai, Xuhuan & Li, Bo & Zheng, Hua & Yang, Yanzheng & Yang, Zihan & Peng, Chenchen, 2023. "Can sedentarization decrease the dependence of pastoral livelihoods on ecosystem services?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Beichen Ge & Congjin Wang & Yuhong Song, 2023. "Ecosystem Services Research in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Angelos Alamanos & Phoebe Koundouri, 2022. "Economics of Incorporating Ecosystem Services into Water Resource Planning and Management," DEOS Working Papers 2211, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    20. Shaokang Fu & Lin Zhao & Zhi Qiao & Tong Sun & Meng Sun & Yuying Hao & Siyu Hu & Yanchang Zhang, 2021. "Development of Ecosystem Health Assessment (EHA) and Application Method: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:488:y:2024:i:c:s0304380023003095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.