IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v360y2017icp108-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boom and bust carbon-nitrogen dynamics during reforestation

Author

Listed:
  • Parolari, Anthony J.
  • Mobley, Megan L.
  • Bacon, Allan R.
  • Katul, Gabriel G.
  • Richter, Daniel deB.
  • Porporato, Amilcare

Abstract

Legacies of historical land use strongly shape contemporary ecosystem dynamics. In old-field secondary forests, tree growth embodies a legacy of soil changes affected by previous cultivation. Three patterns of biomass accumulation during reforestation have been hypothesized previously, including monotonic to steady state, non-monotonic with a single peak then decay to steady state, and multiple oscillations around the steady state. In this paper, the conditions leading to the emergence of these patterns is analyzed. Using observations and models, we demonstrate that divergent reforestation patterns can be explained by contrasting time-scales in ecosystem carbon-nitrogen cycles that are influenced by land use legacies. Model analyses characterize non-monotonic plant-soil trajectories as either single peaks or multiple oscillations during an initial transient phase controlled by soil carbon-nitrogen conditions at the time of planting. Oscillations in plant and soil pools appear in modeled systems with rapid tree growth and low initial soil nitrogen, which stimulate nitrogen competition between trees and decomposers and lead the forest into a state of acute nitrogen deficiency. High initial soil nitrogen dampens oscillations, but enhances the magnitude of the tree biomass peak. These model results are supported by data derived from the long-running Calhoun Long-Term Soil-Ecosystem Experiment from 1957 to 2007. Observed carbon and nitrogen pools reveal distinct tree growth and decay phases, coincident with soil nitrogen depletion and partial re-accumulation. Further, contemporary tree biomass loss decreases with the legacy soil C:N ratio. These results support the idea that non-monotonic reforestation trajectories may result from initial transients in the plant-soil system affected by initial conditions derived from soil changes associated with land-use history.

Suggested Citation

  • Parolari, Anthony J. & Mobley, Megan L. & Bacon, Allan R. & Katul, Gabriel G. & Richter, Daniel deB. & Porporato, Amilcare, 2017. "Boom and bust carbon-nitrogen dynamics during reforestation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 108-119.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:360:y:2017:i:c:p:108-119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.06.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380017303320
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.06.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brander, James A & Taylor, M Scott, 1998. "The Simple Economics of Easter Island: A Ricardo-Malthus Model of Renewable Resource Use," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(1), pages 119-138, March.
    2. W. A. Kurz & C. C. Dymond & G. Stinson & G. J. Rampley & E. T. Neilson & A. L. Carroll & T. Ebata & L. Safranyik, 2008. "Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7190), pages 987-990, April.
    3. Steven S. Perakis & Lars O. Hedin, 2002. "addendum: Nitrogen loss from unpolluted South American forests mainly via dissolved organic compounds," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6898), pages 665-665, August.
    4. Daniel D. Richter & Daniel Markewitz & Susan E. Trumbore & Carol G. Wells, 1999. "Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6739), pages 56-58, July.
    5. Parolari, Anthony J. & Porporato, Amilcare, 2016. "Forest soil carbon and nitrogen cycles under biomass harvest: Stability, transient response, and feedback," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 329(C), pages 64-76.
    6. Steven S. Perakis & Lars O. Hedin, 2002. "Nitrogen loss from unpolluted South American forests mainly via dissolved organic compounds," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6870), pages 416-419, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parolari, Anthony J. & Porporato, Amilcare, 2016. "Forest soil carbon and nitrogen cycles under biomass harvest: Stability, transient response, and feedback," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 329(C), pages 64-76.
    2. Chao Xu & Teng-Chiu Lin & Jr-Chuan Huang & Zhijie Yang & Xiaofei Liu & Decheng Xiong & Shidong Chen & Minhuang Wang & Liuming Yang & Yusheng Yang, 2022. "Microbial Biomass Is More Important than Runoff Export in Predicting Soil Inorganic Nitrogen Concentrations Following Forest Conversion in Subtropical China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Jay S. Singh & D.P. Singh & A.K. Kashyap, 2009. "A comparative account of the microbial biomass-N and N-mineralization of soils under natural forest, grassland and crop field from dry tropical region, India," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(6), pages 223-230.
    4. Ritam Sinha & Sourav Das & Tuhin Ghosh, 2020. "Pollution and its consequences at Ganga Sagar mass bathing in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1413-1430, February.
    5. Maoyuan Feng & Shushi Peng & Yilong Wang & Philippe Ciais & Daniel S. Goll & Jinfeng Chang & Yunting Fang & Benjamin Z. Houlton & Gang Liu & Yan Sun & Yi Xi, 2023. "Overestimated nitrogen loss from denitrification for natural terrestrial ecosystems in CMIP6 Earth System Models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. H. Zhang & Z. Zhao & X. Yi & Y. Lu & L. Cao, 2012. "Effect of fertilization on composition and spatial distribution of dissolved organic nitrogen in paddy soil microbial systems," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(3), pages 128-134.
    7. Huang, Lin & Liu, Jiyuan & Shao, Quanqin & Xu, Xinliang, 2012. "Carbon sequestration by forestation across China: Past, present, and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1291-1299.
    8. James A. Brander, 2007. "Viewpoint: Sustainability: Malthus revisited?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 1-38, February.
    9. Brian C. O'Neill & Deborah Balk & Melanie Brickman & Markos Ezra, 2001. "A Guide to Global Population Projections," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 4(8), pages 203-288.
    10. repec:tiu:tiutis:fe79a9d2-e9e3-4dbc-9539-cdece886993d is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Brian Petersen & Diana Stuart, 2014. "Explanations of a Changing Landscape: A Critical Examination of the British Columbia Bark Beetle Epidemic," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(3), pages 598-613, March.
    12. Nils‐Petter Lagerlöf & Thomas Tangerås, 2008. "From rent seeking to human capital: a model where resource shocks cause transitions from stagnation to growth," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 760-780, August.
    13. Partha Dasgupta & Tapan Mitra & Gerhard Sorger, 2019. "Harvesting the Commons," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(3), pages 613-636, March.
    14. Pedro, de Mendonça, 2009. "Self-Enforcing Climate Change Treaties: A Generalized Differential Game Approach with Applications," MPRA Paper 17889, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Nils-Petter Lagerlof, 2002. "The Roads To and From Serfdom," Macroeconomics 0212011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Metsaranta, J.M. & Kurz, W.A., 2012. "Inter-annual variability of ecosystem production in boreal jack pine forests (1975–2004) estimated from tree-ring data using CBM-CFS3," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 111-123.
    17. Xiaojie Chen & Attila Szolnoki, 2018. "Punishment and inspection for governing the commons in a feedback-evolving game," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Fahse, Lorenz & Heurich, Marco, 2011. "Simulation and analysis of outbreaks of bark beetle infestations and their management at the stand level," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1833-1846.
    19. Schiff, Maurice, 2021. "Low, High and Super Congestion of a Renewable Natural Resource under Autarky and Trade," IZA Discussion Papers 14279, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Knapp, Keith C., 2006. "Recursive Sustainability: Intertemporal Efficiency and Equity," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21472, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    21. Petros G. Sekeris, 2014. "The tragedy of the commons in a violent world," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(3), pages 521-532, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:360:y:2017:i:c:p:108-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.