IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v272y2014icp28-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing model scenarios of variable plankton N/P ratio versus the constant one for the application in the Baltic Sea

Author

Listed:
  • Wan, Zhenwen
  • Bi, Hongsheng

Abstract

Observation data on surface dissolved inorganic nutrients in 2000–2009 at 15 stations in the Baltic Sea were used to analyze the ratio of nitrogen change to phosphorus change (N/P) before and after spring blooms. The ratios of nutrient N/P before and after spring blooms vary from 6.6:1 to 41.5:1. To estimate the spatially varied plankton N/P ratios, the observed nutrient N/P ratios as proxies for plankton N/P ratios are used to extrapolate a spatial pattern, and then the spatial pattern is adjusted by comparing observations and model results and the best fit spatial pattern is selected to discern the horizontal variability of plankton N/P, i.e., low in the center of the Baltic, relatively high away from the center. To examine the potential impact of spatially varied N/P ratios on phytoplankton and nutrients, a three dimensional physical–biogeochemical coupled model is used to compare two scenarios: spatially varied plankton N/P ratios versus a constant N/P ratio. When comparing model results to observation data, model results with spatially varied N/P ratios showed consistent improvements over model results with a constant N/P ratio, specifically in dissolved inorganic nitrogen, dissolved inorganic phosphorus, chlorophyll. Therefore, we concluded that the spatially varied N/P ratios can feature the horizontal distribution of plankton N/P in the Baltic Sea. Furthermore, the impacts of the variable plankton N/P ratio on primary production and nitrogen fixation are also investigated using the 3D ecosystem model. The estimated primary production and nitrogen fixation using the constant N/P ratio of 16:1 are 38% and 317% higher, respectively, than those estimates using the variable N/P ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Wan, Zhenwen & Bi, Hongsheng, 2014. "Comparing model scenarios of variable plankton N/P ratio versus the constant one for the application in the Baltic Sea," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 28-39.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:272:y:2014:i:c:p:28-39
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.09.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438001300447X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.09.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas S. Weber & Curtis Deutsch, 2010. "Ocean nutrient ratios governed by plankton biogeography," Nature, Nature, vol. 467(7315), pages 550-554, September.
    2. Kuznetsov, I. & Neumann, T. & Burchard, H., 2008. "Model study on the ecosystem impact of a variable C:N:P ratio for cyanobacteria in the Baltic Proper," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 107-114.
    3. Christopher A. Klausmeier & Elena Litchman & Tanguy Daufresne & Simon A. Levin, 2004. "Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton," Nature, Nature, vol. 429(6988), pages 171-174, May.
    4. Wan, Zhenwen & Bi, Hongsheng & She, Jun, 2013. "Comparison of two light attenuation parameterization focusing on timing of spring bloom and primary production in the Baltic Sea," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 40-49.
    5. Maar, Marie & Møller, Eva Friis & Larsen, Jesper & Madsen, Kristine Skovgaard & Wan, Zhenwen & She, Jun & Jonasson, Lars & Neumann, Thomas, 2011. "Ecosystem modelling across a salinity gradient from the North Sea to the Baltic Sea," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(10), pages 1696-1711.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maar, Marie & Markager, Stiig & Madsen, Kristine Skovgaard & Windolf, Jørgen & Lyngsgaard, Maren Moltke & Andersen, Hans Estrup & Møller, Eva Friis, 2016. "The importance of local versus external nutrient loads for Chl a and primary production in the Western Baltic Sea," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 258-272.
    2. Daniel Graeber & Mark J. McCarthy & Tom Shatwell & Dietrich Borchardt & Erik Jeppesen & Martin Søndergaard & Torben L. Lauridsen & Thomas A. Davidson, 2024. "Consistent stoichiometric long-term relationships between nutrients and chlorophyll-a across shallow lakes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Auguères, Anne-Sophie & Loreau, Michel, 2016. "Biotic regulation of non-limiting nutrient pools and coupling of biogeochemical cycles," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 334(C), pages 1-7.
    4. Kari Hyytiäinen & Lassi Ahlvik & Heini Ahtiainen & Janne Artell & Anni Huhtala & Kim Dahlbo, 2015. "Policy Goals for Improved Water Quality in the Baltic Sea: When do the Benefits Outweigh the Costs?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 61(2), pages 217-241, June.
    5. Macías, Diego & Stips, Adolf & Garcia-Gorriz, Elisa, 2014. "The relevance of deep chlorophyll maximum in the open Mediterranean Sea evaluated through 3D hydrodynamic-biogeochemical coupled simulations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 281(C), pages 26-37.
    6. Li, Yu & Waite, Anya M. & Gal, Gideon & Hipsey, Matthew R., 2013. "An analysis of the relationship between phytoplankton internal stoichiometry and water column N:P ratios in a dynamic lake environment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 196-213.
    7. Nurmi, Väinö & Ahtiainen, Heini, 2018. "Distributional Weights in Environmental Valuation and Cost-benefit Analysis: Theory and Practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 217-228.
    8. Clark, James R. & Daines, Stuart J. & Lenton, Timothy M. & Watson, Andrew J. & Williams, Hywel T.P., 2011. "Individual-based modelling of adaptation in marine microbial populations using genetically defined physiological parameters," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(23), pages 3823-3837.
    9. Dittrich, M. & Wehrli, B. & Reichert, P., 2009. "Lake sediments during the transient eutrophication period: Reactive-transport model and identifiability study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(20), pages 2751-2769.
    10. Gurkan, Zeren & Christensen, Asbjørn & Maar, Marie & Møller, Eva Friis & Madsen, Kristine Skovgaard & Munk, Peter & Mosegaard, Henrik, 2013. "Spatio-temporal dynamics of growth and survival of Lesser Sandeel early life-stages in the North Sea: Predictions from a coupled individual-based and hydrodynamic–biogeochemical model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 294-306.
    11. Jing Chen & Yongqiang Zhou & Yunlin Zhang, 2022. "New Insights into Microbial Degradation of Cyanobacterial Organic Matter Using a Fractionation Procedure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Salama, El-Sayed & Kurade, Mayur B. & Abou-Shanab, Reda A.I. & El-Dalatony, Marwa M. & Yang, Il-Seung & Min, Booki & Jeon, Byong-Hun, 2017. "Recent progress in microalgal biomass production coupled with wastewater treatment for biofuel generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1189-1211.
    13. Jiancai Deng & Fang Chen & Weiping Hu & Xin Lu & Bin Xu & David P. Hamilton, 2019. "Variations in the Distribution of Chl- a and Simulation Using a Multiple Regression Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Wan, Zhenwen & Bi, Hongsheng & She, Jun, 2013. "Comparison of two light attenuation parameterization focusing on timing of spring bloom and primary production in the Baltic Sea," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 40-49.
    15. Maar, Marie & Butenschön, Momme & Daewel, Ute & Eggert, Anja & Fan, Wei & Hjøllo, Solfrid S. & Hufnagl, Marc & Huret, Martin & Ji, Rubao & Lacroix, Geneviève & Peck, Myron A. & Radtke, Hagen & Sailley, 2018. "Responses of summer phytoplankton biomass to changes in top-down forcing: Insights from comparative modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 376(C), pages 54-67.
    16. Han, Yue & Zhou, Yuntao, 2022. "Investigating biophysical control of marine phytoplankton dynamics via Bayesian mechanistic modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).
    17. Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Ahtiainen, Heini & Artell, Janne & Meyerhoff, Jürgen, 2017. "Choosing a Functional Form for an International Benefit Transfer: Evidence from a Nine-country Valuation Experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 104-113.
    18. Arhonditsis, George B. & Stow, Craig A. & Paerl, Hans W. & Valdes-Weaver, Lexia M. & Steinberg, Laura J. & Reckhow, Kenneth H., 2007. "Delineation of the role of nutrient dynamics and hydrologic forcing on phytoplankton patterns along a freshwater–marine continuum," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 230-246.
    19. Schernewski, Gerald & Friedland, Rene & Carstens, Marina & Hirt, Ulrike & Leujak, Wera & Nausch, Günther & Neumann, Thomas & Petenati, Thorkild & Sagert, Sigrid & Wasmund, Norbert & Weber, Mario von, 2015. "Implementation of European marine policy: New water quality targets for German Baltic waters," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 305-321.
    20. Tsakalakis, Ioannis & Pahlow, Markus & Oschlies, Andreas & Blasius, Bernd & Ryabov, Alexey B., 2018. "Diel light cycle as a key factor for modelling phytoplankton biogeography and diversity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 241-248.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:272:y:2014:i:c:p:28-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.