IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v220y2009i12p1522-1533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-mutualist simulation: Applying biological market models to diverse mycorrhizal communities

Author

Listed:
  • Cowden, Charles C.
  • Peterson, Chris J.

Abstract

We present a cellular automaton that simulates the interaction between a host tree and multiple potential mycorrhizal symbionts and generates testable hypotheses of how processes at the scale of individual root tips may explain mycorrhizal community composition. Existing theoretical biological market models imply that a single host is able to interact with and select from multiple symbionts to organize an optimal symbiont community. When evaluating the tree–symbiont interaction, two scales must be considered simultaneously: the scale of the entire host plant at which carbon utilization and nutrient demands operate, and the scale of the individual root tip, at which colonization and carbon-nutrient trade occurs. Three strategies that may be employed by the host tree for optimizing carbon use and nutrient acquisition through mycorrhizal symbiont communities are simulated: (1) carbon pool adjustment, in which the plant controls only the total amount of carbon to be distributed uniformly throughout the root system, (2) symbiont selection, wherein the plant opts either for or against the interaction at each fine root tip, and (3) selective carbon allocation, wherein the plant adjusts the amount of carbon allocated to each root tip based on the cost of nutrients. Strategies were tested over various nutrient availabilities (the amount of inorganically and organically bound nutrients). Success was defined on the basis of minimizing carbon expended for nutrient acquisition because this would allow more carbon to be utilized for growth and reproduction. In all cases, the symbiont selection and selective carbon allocation strategies were able to meet the nutritional requirements of the plant, but did not necessarily optimize carbon use. The carbon pool adjustment strategy is the only strategy that does not operate at the individual root tip scale, and the strategy was not successful when inorganic nutrients were scarce since there is no mechanism to exclude suboptimal symbionts. The combination of the symbiont selection strategy and the carbon pool adjustment resulted in optimal carbon use and nutrient acquisition under all environmental conditions but result in monospecific symbiont assemblages. On the other hand, the selective carbon allocation strategy is the only strategy that maintained successful, multi-symbiont communities. The simulations presented here thus imply clear hypotheses about the effect of nutrient availability on symbiont selection and mycorrhizal community richness and composition.

Suggested Citation

  • Cowden, Charles C. & Peterson, Chris J., 2009. "A multi-mutualist simulation: Applying biological market models to diverse mycorrhizal communities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(12), pages 1522-1533.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:12:p:1522-1533
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.03.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380009002270
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.03.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salant, Stephen W., 2006. "The economics of mutualisms: optimal utiliztion of mycorrhizal mutualistic partners by plants," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series qt14b5d950, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
    2. Suzanne W. Simard & David A. Perry & Melanie D. Jones & David D. Myrold & Daniel M. Durall & Randy Molina, 1997. "Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field," Nature, Nature, vol. 388(6642), pages 579-582, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sakai, Kenshi & Brown, Patrick H. & Rosenstock, Todd S. & Upadhyaya, Shrinivasa K. & Hastings, Alan, 2022. "Spatial phase synchronisation of pistachio alternate bearing: Common-noise-induced synchronisation of coupled chaotic oscillators," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).
    2. Melea Press, 2021. "Developing a strong sustainability research program in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 96-114, June.
    3. Fruteau, C., 2010. "Biological markets in the everyday lives of mangabeys and vervets : An observational and experimental study," Other publications TiSEM 3f4fc3e2-723d-4455-9ed2-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. van Winden, Frans, 2023. "The informational affective tie mechanism: on the role of uncertainty, context, and attention in caring," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Ch.D.B. Hawkins & A. Dhar, 2013. "Birch (Betula papyrifera) × white spruce (Picea glauca) interactions in mixedwood stands: implications for management," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(4), pages 137-149.
    6. Zachary Michael Isaac Gould & Vikram Mohanty & Georg Reichard & Walid Saad & Tripp Shealy & Susan Day, 2023. "A Mycorrhizal Model for Transactive Solar Energy Markets with Battery Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Stephen Fox & Yusuf Mubarak & Abdurasak Adam, 2020. "Ecological Analyses of Social Sustainability for International Production with Fixed and Moveable Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:220:y:2009:i:12:p:1522-1533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.