IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v70y2024ics1062940824000068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who has mastered exchange rate ups and downs: China or the United States?

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Tie-Ying
  • Lin, Ye

Abstract

This study uses the generalized sup augmented Dickey–Fuller (GSADF) method to study the beginnings and endings of the China–US exchange rate bubbles that occurred during the period 1981–2021 and the factors that affected those exchange rate bubbles from a nonlinear perspective. The contribution of this paper is to quantitatively assess the determinants of these bubbles. We find two bubble periods in the China–US exchange rate, one from January 1985 to December 1986 and the other from August 2005 to August 2015. Our findings suggest that the Chinese interest rate and the difference in interest rates between the US and China positively impact China–US exchange rate bubbles, while the US interest rate has no effect on the exchange rate bubble in bubble periods. Additionally, FDI from China to the US and the subprime crisis negatively influence China–US exchange rate bubbles. The findings of this paper are of value as a reference for maintaining the stability of the RMB exchange rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Tie-Ying & Lin, Ye, 2024. "Who has mastered exchange rate ups and downs: China or the United States?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:70:y:2024:i:c:s1062940824000068
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2024.102082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824000068
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2024.102082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:70:y:2024:i:c:s1062940824000068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.