IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v68y2023ics1062940823000992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cross-border interaction of financial stress: From the perspective of pattern causality

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Xiaoyang
  • Le, Wei
  • Li, Jianfeng
  • Liu, Enmeng

Abstract

It remains enigmatic and challenging, yet inspiring, to identify the interactions of financial stress, particularly when integration of international financial markets has intensified. Considering the nonlinear nature of financial markets, this study investigated the cross-border interaction of financial stress from the perspective of pattern causality. A multi-type and dynamic recognition of cross-border interactions was made, which can be characterized as positive, negative, or dark causality. Using the composite indicator of systemic stress (CISS) ranging from October 10, 2006, to July 15, 2022, empirical studies were conducted on the financial markets of China, the U.S., and the Euro area. The results showed that the positive causality of financial stress dominates, followed by dark causality in most cases. The positive causality between financial stress is enhanced in periods of extensive stress. When stress is released, positive causality declines and dark causality increases, implying that interaction structures are hidden and become opaque. In addition, the causality of different financial markets shows some heterogeneity: the positive causality of financial stress is stronger in advanced economies, while the dark causality between China and the U.S./Euro area is more evident than that between other advanced economies. This implies greater uncertainty regarding the cross-border interactions of emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Xiaoyang & Le, Wei & Li, Jianfeng & Liu, Enmeng, 2023. "The cross-border interaction of financial stress: From the perspective of pattern causality," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:68:y:2023:i:c:s1062940823000992
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2023.101976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940823000992
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2023.101976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:68:y:2023:i:c:s1062940823000992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.