IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v57y2015icp75-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using child welfare assessments and latent class analysis to identify prevalence and comorbidity of parent service needs

Author

Listed:
  • Jarpe-Ratner, Elizabeth
  • Bellamy, Jennifer L.
  • Yang, Duck-Hye
  • Smithgall, Cheryl

Abstract

Data collected through Illinois's Integrated Assessment (IA) program—an assessment and service coordination program incorporating clinical assessments of both parents following a child's placement in foster care—offers a unique opportunity to examine the service needs of parents within a family context. Between January 2007 and June 2010, integrated assessments were completed with 4089 families in which at least one parent participated in the assessment. Utilizing these data, this study employs a Latent Class Analysis approach to identify the patterns of service needs of parents with children entering foster care. Latent class models were generated for mothers and fathers who participated in comprehensive family assessments based on identified service needs. Models revealed “low need” and “high need” classes among both mothers and fathers. A distinct class characterized by substance abuse needs emerged among fathers and a similar class among mothers was characterized by both substance abuse and mental health needs. A mental health needs class was identified among fathers while a similar class among mothers was characterized by both mental health needs as well as trauma symptoms. In examining the distribution of classes among families where both parents were present, the largest groups of families were those in which both parents fell into the “low need” classes, those in which the father fell into the “low need” class and the mother fell into the “substance abuse and mental health” class, and those in which both the mother and the father fell into the “substance abuse” classes. Implications for case assignment practices, father engagement, and addressing comorbid service needs are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarpe-Ratner, Elizabeth & Bellamy, Jennifer L. & Yang, Duck-Hye & Smithgall, Cheryl, 2015. "Using child welfare assessments and latent class analysis to identify prevalence and comorbidity of parent service needs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 75-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:57:y:2015:i:c:p:75-82
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019074091530027X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kohl, Patricia L. & Edleson, Jeffrey L. & English, Diana J. & Barth, Richard P., 2005. "Domestic violence and pathways into child welfare services: Findings from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(11), pages 1167-1182, November.
    2. Cheng, Tyrone C., 2010. "Factors associated with reunification: A longitudinal analysis of long-term foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1311-1316, October.
    3. Dufour, Sarah & Lavergne, Chantal & Larrivee, Marie-Claude & Trocme, Nico, 2008. "Who are these parents involved in child neglect A differential analysis by parent gender and family structure," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 141-156, February.
    4. Lietz, Cynthia A., 2011. "Theoretical adherence to family centered practice: Are strengths-based principles illustrated in families' descriptions of child welfare services?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 888-893, June.
    5. D'Andrade, Amy C. & Chambers, Ruth M., 2012. "Parental problems, case plan requirements, and service targeting in child welfare reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2131-2138.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Jangmin & Trahan, Mark & Bellamy, Jennifer & Hall, James A., 2019. "Advancing the innovation of family meeting models: The role of teamwork and parent engagement in improving permanency," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 147-155.
    2. Lloyd Sieger, Margaret & Becker, Jessica & Philips, Jon & Lee, Jung Wun & Moore, Timothy E., 2023. "Latent classes among substance-involved families in child welfare: Associations with treatment completion and reunification," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Xiumin Hong & Sijie Zhao & Qianqian Liu, 2022. "Unusual Experience in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Young Children’s Readjustment from Home to Preschool following School Closures in Different Risk Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Tyrone C. & Lo, Celia C., 2018. "Racial disparities in the proportion of needed services maltreated children received," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 72-81.
    2. Estefan, Lianne Fuino & Coulter, Martha L. & VandeWeerd, Carla L. & Armstrong, Mary & Gorski, Peter, 2012. "Receiving mandated therapeutic services: Experiences of parents involved in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2353-2360.
    3. Cheng, Tyrone C. & Lo, Celia C., 2020. "Receipt of substance-use services by caregivers involved in the child-welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Lee, Hee Yun & Lightfoot, Elizabeth & Edleson, Jeffrey L., 2008. "Differences among battered mothers in their involvement with child protection services: Could the perpetrator's biological relationship to the child have an impact?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 1189-1197, October.
    5. Dinehart, Laura H. & Manfra, Louis & Katz, Lynne F. & Hartman, Suzanne C., 2012. "Associations between center-based care accreditation status and the early educational outcomes of children in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1072-1080.
    6. Diana N. Teixeira & Isabel Narciso & Margarida R. Henriques, 2022. "Driving for Success in Family Reunification—Professionals’ Views on Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    7. English, Diana J. & Edleson, Jeffrey L. & Herrick, Mary E., 2005. "Domestic violence in one state's child protective caseload: A study of differential case dispositions and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(11), pages 1183-1201, November.
    8. Hughes, Judy & Chau, Shirley, 2013. "Making complex decisions: Child protection workers' practices and interventions with families experiencing intimate partner violence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 611-617.
    9. Chartier, Stéphanie & Blavier, Adélaïde, 2021. "Should the reintegration of children in foster care into their biological families be the only goal of the legislation governing foster care? Factors influencing the relations between parents and thei," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    10. Johnson-Motoyama, Michelle & Brook, Jody & Yan, Yueqi & McDonald, Thomas P., 2013. "Cost analysis of the strengthening families program in reducing time to family reunification among substance-affected families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 244-252.
    11. Kemp, Susan P. & Marcenko, Maureen O. & Lyons, Sandra J. & Kruzich, Jean M., 2014. "Strength-based practice and parental engagement in child welfare services: An empirical examination," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P1), pages 27-35.
    12. Malvaso, Catia G. & Delfabbro, Paul H., 2020. "Description and evaluation of a trial program aimed at reunifying adolescents in statutory long-term out-of-home care with their birth families: The adolescent reunification program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Zanoni, Lee & Warburton, Wayne & Bussey, Kay & McMaugh, Anne, 2014. "Are all fathers in child protection families uncommitted, uninvolved and unable to change?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 83-94.
    14. Barth, Richard P. & Weigensberg, Elizabeth C. & Fisher, Philip A. & Fetrow, Becky & Green, Rebecca L., 2008. "Reentry of elementary aged children following reunification from foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 353-364, April.
    15. Meyer, Andrea S. & McWey, Lenore M. & McKendrick, Wachell & Henderson, Tammy L., 2010. "Substance using parents, foster care, and termination of parental rights: The importance of risk factors for legal outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 639-649, May.
    16. Williams, Gabriela & Tonmyr, Lil & Jack, Susan M. & Fallon, Barbara & MacMillan, Harriet L., 2011. "Determinants of maltreatment substantiation in a sample of infants involved with the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1345-1353, August.
    17. Vanderfaeillie, Johan & Borms, Dorien & Teunissen, M.S.L. & Gypen, Laura & Van Holen, Frank, 2023. "Reasons used by Flemish foster care workers in family reunification decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    18. Yampolskaya, Svetlana & Callejas, Linda M., 2020. "The effect of child mental health service use on child safety and permanency in substance misusing families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    19. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    20. Nese, Rhonda N.T. & Anderson, Cynthia M. & Ruppert, Traci & Fisher, Philip A., 2016. "Effects of a video feedback parent training program during child welfare visitation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 266-276.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:57:y:2015:i:c:p:75-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.