IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v32y2010i1p98-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring outcomes of multiple diagnosis groups in residential treatment using the brief psychiatric rating scale for children (BPRS-C)

Author

Listed:
  • Henderson, Lorrie
  • McIlhaney, Krista
  • Wasser, Thomas

Abstract

Treatment organizations are being placed under increased pressure to quantitatively demonstrate the efficacy of their programs. Demonstrations of treatment effectiveness are often necessary regardless of the treatment setting. This study was conducted to determine if a valid measure, the BPRS-C, would be able to detect symptom reduction in a population that was less acute than the hospitalized adolescent. The BPRS-C is administered by trained staff and contains subscales for seven constructs: behavior problems, depression, thinking disturbance, psychomotor, withdraw/retardation, anxiety and organicity. A total score for the tool, while reported in the literature, has never been validated for use. Four diagnosis groups were tested with the tool after a suitable observation period after admission and then again at the time of discharge. These diagnosis groups were Conduct Disorder (n = 87), Bipolar disorder (n = 39), Depression (n = 53) and Intermittent Explosive Disorder (n = 109). The results indicated that the BPRS-C was able to detect improvement in client condition on several subscales within each of the diagnosis groups. The conclusions from this research are that the BPRS-C is a tool that has application in the adolescent residential setting. The diagnosis groups could be reflective of the client diagnosis mix that might be encountered in other similar institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Henderson, Lorrie & McIlhaney, Krista & Wasser, Thomas, 2010. "Measuring outcomes of multiple diagnosis groups in residential treatment using the brief psychiatric rating scale for children (BPRS-C)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 98-102, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:1:p:98-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(09)00198-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:32:y:2010:i:1:p:98-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.