IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v155y2023ics0190740923003961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlates of informant discrepancies in self-harm among youth involved in child protective services

Author

Listed:
  • Rabinowitz, Jill A.
  • Kahn, Geoffrey D.
  • Felton, Julia W.
  • A. G. Drabick, Deborah
  • Wilcox, Holly C.

Abstract

Youth involved with child protective services (CPS) are at elevated risk for engaging in self-harm. Participation in interventions or treatments that may reduce youths’ self-harm behaviors often depends on the accurate reporting of their self-injurious behaviors. However, informants often disagree on the presence or severity of self-harm engagement, making the identification of youth in need of treatment more challenging. The current study aims to characterize discrepancies between youth and caregiver reports of children’s self-harm among a sample of youth with a history of CPS involvement, and to identify factors (e.g., demographics, youth and caregiver psychological impairments, aspects of the caregiving environment) associated with these discrepancies. Participants (N = 258) were drawn from a large, nationally representative sample of youth under the age of 18 (mean age = 13.8) and their caregivers who were investigated by CPS. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine correlates of discrepancies in caregiver and youth reports of youth self-harm. Results indicated that 10% of caregiver-child dyads agreed on children’s engagement in self-harm. In 33% of cases, only the child reported self-harm and in 57% of cases, only the caregiver reported youth self-harm. Being a biological caregiver, child female sex, higher levels of internalizing symptoms, greater post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and greater caregiver alcohol use was associated with a lower likelihood of caregivers reporting self-harm only. Older child age, lower externalizing symptoms, higher PTSD symptoms, and greater levels of caregiver emotional security and structure were linked to lower odds of children reporting self-harm only. These results underscore important factors to consider when assessing self-harm among youth involved with CPS and have potential implications for practice guidelines in this population.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabinowitz, Jill A. & Kahn, Geoffrey D. & Felton, Julia W. & A. G. Drabick, Deborah & Wilcox, Holly C., 2023. "Correlates of informant discrepancies in self-harm among youth involved in child protective services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:155:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923003961
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923003961
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Antonio Piqueras & Victoria Soto-Sanz & Jesús Rodríguez-Marín & Carlos García-Oliva, 2019. "What is the Role of Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms in Adolescent Suicide Behaviors?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Dubois-Comtois, Karine & Bussières, Eve-Line & Cyr, Chantal & St-Onge, Janie & Baudry, Claire & Milot, Tristan & Labbé, Annie-Pier, 2021. "Are children and adolescents in foster care at greater risk of mental health problems than their counterparts? A meta-analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rabassa, Judit & Fuentes-Peláez, Nuria, 2023. "Effectiveness of group intervention in improving kinship care families’ outcomes: A systematic review of group interventions aimed at kinship caregivers and youth in kinship care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. David Álvarez-García & Andrea Núñez & María del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes & José Carlos Núñez, 2019. "Peer Victimization in Overweight Adolescents and Its Effect on Their Self-Esteem and Peer Difficulties," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. MacDonald, Sarah & Trubey, Rob & Noyes, Jane & Vinnicombe, Soo & Morgan, Helen E. & Willis, Simone & Boffey, Maria & Melendez-Torres, G.J. & Robling, Michael & Wooders, Charlotte & Evans, Rhiannon, 2024. "Mental health and wellbeing interventions for care-experienced children and young people: Systematic review and synthesis of process evaluations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Hoffmeister, Michael, 2024. "Inequitable access to relative caregiving: Implications of foster care regulations in Finland, New Zealand, and the United States," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Danner Touati, Camille & Miljkovitch, Raphaële & Elina Sirparanta, Aino & Ahmad, Sam & Toléon, Camille & Deborde, Anne-Sophie, 2023. "Suicidal risk among adult survivors of childhood maltreatment: The role of parent–child contact during out of home placement," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Elisa Mancinelli & Gaia Dell’Arciprete & Silvia Salcuni, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Foster Parents’ Psychological Adjustment and Parenting Style—An Evaluation of Foster Parents and Foster Children Variables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Evans, Rhiannon & Cunningham, Emily & Stabler, Lorna & Vaughan, Rachael & Davies, Brittany & Cummings, Aimee & Boffey, Maria & Wooders, Charlotte & Mannay, Dawn, 2024. "Acceptability, feasibility and perceived effectiveness of online and remote mental health and wellbeing interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study with care-experienced young peop," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Lecompte, Vanessa & Pascuzzo, Katherine & Hélie, Sonia, 2023. "A look inside family reunification for children with attachment difficulties: An exploratory study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Vish, Nora L. & Budig, Kimberly & Stolfi, Adrienne & Elliston, Rebecca & Thackeray, Jonathan D., 2024. "Predictors of mental health emergency department visits and psychiatric hospitalizations in children in foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:155:y:2023:i:c:s0190740923003961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.