IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v144y2023ics0190740922003681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the effectiveness of the systemic practice model of children’s social care – A pilot study on child- and family-level outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Aaltio, Elina

Abstract

The Systemic Practice Model (SPM) is a Finnish adaptation of the Reclaiming Social Work (RSW) model, which incorporates systemic ideas and practice into children’s social care. This study is the first attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of the RSW model outside England. The study employed a quasi-experimental repeated measures design. Questionnaires assessing child- and family-level outcomes and the quantity (i.e., number of meetings) and quality (i.e., service user feedback) of the practice were administered to social workers, children and parents twice over a six-month follow-up period. Outcome data comprise 112 cases (SPM cases n = 56, service-as-usual cases n = 56) from 18 child protection teams (SPM teams n = 9, service-as-usual teams n = 9) at three sites. The overall need for child protection decreased across the sample during the follow-up period. While the intensiveness of practice was higher in the SPM group, no significant differences were found between the study groups in practice outcomes or service user satisfaction with child protection. The limitations and implications of the study for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaltio, Elina, 2023. "Evaluating the effectiveness of the systemic practice model of children’s social care – A pilot study on child- and family-level outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:144:y:2023:i:c:s0190740922003681
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740922003681
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isokuortti, Nanne & Aaltio, Elina, 2020. "Fidelity and influencing factors in the Systemic Practice Model of children's social care in Finland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Leathers, Sonya J. & Melka-Kaffer, Catherine & Spielfogel, Jill E. & Atkins, Marc S., 2016. "Use of evidence-based interventions in child welfare: Do attitudes matter?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 375-382.
    3. Julien-Chinn, Francie J. & Lietz, Cynthia A., 2019. "Building learning cultures in the child welfare workforce," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 360-365.
    4. Bostock, Lisa & Patrizo, Louis & Godfrey, Tessa & Forrester, Donald, 2019. "What is the impact of supervision on direct practice with families?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isokuortti, Nanne & Aaltio, Elina, 2020. "Fidelity and influencing factors in the Systemic Practice Model of children's social care in Finland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Bostock, Lisa & Patrizio, Louis & Godfrey, Tessa & Forrester, Donald, 2022. "Why does systemic supervision support practitioners’ practice more effectively with children and families?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    3. Thibodeau, Pari Shah & Park, In Young & Dunbar, Annie Zean & He, Amy, 2023. "What makes a good learning culture? The role of professional development among child welfare workers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Myers, Christina & Garcia, Antonio & Beidas, Rinad & Yang, Zixiaojie, 2020. "Factors that predict child welfare caseworker referrals to an evidence-based parenting program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. repec:gdk:wpaper:60 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:144:y:2023:i:c:s0190740922003681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.