IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v143y2022ics0190740922003152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dyadic parent-child interaction coding system (DPICS): Negative talk as an indicator of dysfunctional mother-child interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Cañas, María
  • Ibabe, Izaskun
  • Arruabarrena, Ignacia
  • De Paúl, Joaquín

Abstract

The Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS-IV) is a widely used observational instrument that assesses Parent-child interaction (PCI) quality. However, studies specifically examining its psychometric properties published in peer-reviewed journals are scarce. The present study aimed to provide evidence on the discriminative validity of the DPICS-IV to identify indicators of parent–child interaction among clinical mother–child dyads compared to non-clinical.

Suggested Citation

  • Cañas, María & Ibabe, Izaskun & Arruabarrena, Ignacia & De Paúl, Joaquín, 2022. "The dyadic parent-child interaction coding system (DPICS): Negative talk as an indicator of dysfunctional mother-child interaction," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:143:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922003152
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740922003152
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106679?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frances M. Nilsen & Jazmin D.C. Ruiz & Nicolle S. Tulve, 2020. "A Meta-Analysis of Stressors from the Total Environment Associated with Children’s General Cognitive Ability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-35, July.
    2. Allen, Brian & Timmer, Susan G. & Urquiza, Anthony J., 2014. "Parent–Child Interaction Therapy as an attachment-based intervention: Theoretical rationale and pilot data with adopted children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P3), pages 334-341.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Woodfield, M.J. & Cargo, T. & Barnett, D. & Lambie, I., 2020. "Understanding New Zealand therapist experiences of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) training and implementation, and how these compare internationally," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Krishnamoorthy, Govind & Hessing, Paula & Middeldorp, Christel & Branjerdporn, Melissa, 2020. "Effects of the ‘Circle of Security’ group parenting program (COS-P) with foster carers: An observational study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Onovbiona, Harlee & Mapes, Ayla R. & Quetsch, Lauren B. & Theodorou, Laurie L. & McNeil, Cheryl B., 2023. "Parent-child interaction therapy for children in foster care and children with posttraumatic stress: Exploring behavioral outcomes and graduation rates in a large state-wide sample," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Nina Thorup Dalgaard & Maiken Pontoppidan & Morten Kjær Thomsen & Bjørn Christian Arleth Viinholt & Trine Filges, 2020. "PROTOCOL: Parenting interventions to support parent/child attachment and psychosocial adjustment in foster and adoptive parents and children: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), March.
    5. Nina T. Dalgaard & Trine Filges & Bjørn C. A. Viinholt & Maiken Pontoppidan, 2022. "Parenting interventions to support parent/child attachment and psychosocial adjustment in foster and adoptive parents and children: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:143:y:2022:i:c:s0190740922003152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.