IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v107y2019ics0190740919306498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility study of a preventive parenting program with mothers of children born preterm

Author

Listed:
  • Belotti, Francine
  • Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani
  • Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins

Abstract

Preterm infants constitute a high-risk population for presenting emotional and behavioral problems and developmental dysregulation. Parenting preventive interventions can support mothers to act as co-regulators and prevent child behavior problems. The ACT – Raising Safe Kids Program is recommended to strengthen positive parenting practices. The present study aimed to examine the feasibility of the ACT Program in a target sample of mothers of children born preterm, comparing parenting practices and child behavior problems at pre- and post-intervention. The sample consisted of 30 mothers of 1- to 7- year - old children born preterm. The mothers answered the ACT and Parenting and Family Adjustment scales, and the Strengthen and Difficulties Questionnaire, in the pre- and post-intervention. The within-group comparison was performed. The results showed that, after the intervention, there was a significant improvement in parenting practices dimensions of communication, emotional/behavioral regulation, monitoring of electronic media, positive encouragement, and parental consistency and adjustment. Also, the coercive practices decreased in the post-intervention. Furthermore, there was a decrease in child behavior problems and improvement in the pro-social behavior, from pre- to post-intervention. In conclusion, the ACT showed the feasibility to improve positive parenting practices, enabling mothers to act as a co-regulator of the behavior of children born preterm.

Suggested Citation

  • Belotti, Francine & Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2019. "Feasibility study of a preventive parenting program with mothers of children born preterm," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:107:y:2019:i:c:s0190740919306498
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740919306498
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104526?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Knox, Michele & Burkhart, Kimberly, 2014. "A multi-site study of the ACT Raising Safe Kids program: Predictors of outcomes and attrition," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 20-24.
    2. Weymouth, Lindsay Adelman & Howe, Tasha R., 2011. "A multi-site evaluation of Parents Raising Safe Kids Violence Prevention Program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1960-1967, October.
    3. Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & McCoy, Dana Charles & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2018. "Relations between parenting practices, socioeconomic status, and child behavior in Brazil," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 93-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lotto, Camila Regina & Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2022. "Feasibility and acceptability study of the online ACT-Raising Safe Kids program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrenz, Priscila & Yousafzai, Aisha Khizar & Habigzang, Luísa Fernanda, 2021. "ACT Raising Safe Kids Program improves parenting practices, beliefs about physical punishment, management of anger, and mental health: Initial evidence from a study in Brazil," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Lotto, Camila Regina & Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2022. "Feasibility and acceptability study of the online ACT-Raising Safe Kids program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & Pedro, Maria Eduarda André & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2016. "Effectiveness of ACT Raising Safe Kids Parenting Program in a developing country," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 315-323.
    4. Martins, Rafaela Costa & Machado, Adriana Kramer Fiala & Shenderovich, Yulia & Soares, Tâmara Biolo & da Cruz, Suélen Henriques & Altafim, Elisa Raquel Pisani & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins & Barro, 2020. "Parental attendance in two early-childhood training programmes to improve nurturing care: A randomized controlled trial," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & McCoy, Dana Charles & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2018. "Relations between parenting practices, socioeconomic status, and child behavior in Brazil," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 93-102.
    6. Qi, Di & Wu, Yichao, 2020. "Family’s social economic status and child educational outcomes in China: The mediating effects of parenting practices and children’s learning attitudes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Toran, Mehmet & Özden, Bülent, 2022. "Are there any changes in mothers' attitudes? Analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 quarantine on child-rearing attitudes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Zanoni, Lee & Warburton, Wayne & Bussey, Kay & McMaugh, Anne, 2013. "Fathers as ‘core business’ in child welfare practice and research: An interdisciplinary review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1055-1070.
    9. Alves, Claudia R.L. & Gaspardo, Claudia M. & Altafim, Elisa R.P. & Linhares, Maria Beatriz M., 2022. "Effectiveness of a longitudinal psychosocial intervention to strengthen mother–child interactions: The role of biological and contextual moderators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. Knox, Michele & Burkhart, Kimberly, 2014. "A multi-site study of the ACT Raising Safe Kids program: Predictors of outcomes and attrition," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 20-24.
    11. Liu, Qianqian & Zhou, Nan & Cao, Hongjian & Hong, Xiumin, 2020. "Family socioeconomic status and Chinese young children’ social competence: Parenting processes as mediators and contextualizing factors as moderators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Dana C McCoy & Jorge Cuartas & Marcus Waldman & Günther Fink, 2019. "Contextual variation in young children’s acquisition of social-emotional skills," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, November.
    13. Pinheiro-Carozzo, Nádia Prazeres & Murta, Sheila Giardini & Gato, Jorge Júlio de Carvalho Valadas & Fontaine, Anne Marie Germaine Victorine & Vinha, Luís Gustavo do Amaral, 2021. "Differential impacts of the Brazilian Strengthening Families Program (SFP 10-14): A study into changes in the parenting styles of vulnerable families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Burak, Durmus, 2023. "Psychometric properties of pandemic awareness scale for students aged 8–12: The case of COVID-19," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:107:y:2019:i:c:s0190740919306498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.