IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i8p2786-2808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overall and pairwise segregation tests based on nearest neighbor contingency tables

Author

Listed:
  • Ceyhan, Elvan

Abstract

Multivariate interaction between two or more classes (or species) has important consequences in many fields and may cause multivariate clustering patterns such as spatial segregation or association. The spatial segregation occurs when members of a class tend to be found near members of the same class (i.e.,near conspecifics) while spatial association occurs when members of a class tend to be found near members of the other class or classes. These patterns can be studied using a nearest neighbor contingency table (NNCT). The null hypothesis is randomness in the nearest neighbor (NN) structure, which may result from-among other patterns-random labeling (RL) or complete spatial randomness (CSR) of points from two or more classes (which is called the CSR independence, henceforth). New versions of overall and cell-specific tests based on NNCTs (i.e.,NNCT-tests) are introduced and compared with Dixon's overall and cell-specific tests and various other spatial clustering methods. Overall segregation tests are used to detect any deviation from the null case, while the cell-specific tests are post hoc pairwise spatial interaction tests that are applied when the overall test yields a significant result. The distributional properties of these tests are analyzed and finite sample performance of the tests are assessed by an extensive Monte Carlo simulation study. Furthermore, it is shown that the new NNCT-tests have better performance in terms of Type I error and power estimates. The methods are also applied on two real life data sets for illustrative purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ceyhan, Elvan, 2009. "Overall and pairwise segregation tests based on nearest neighbor contingency tables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2786-2808, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:8:p:2786-2808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00389-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kulldorff, Martin, 2006. "Tests of Spatial Randomness Adjusted for an Inhomogeneity: A General Framework," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1289-1305, September.
    2. A. J. Baddeley & J. Møller & R. Waagepetersen, 2000. "Non‐ and semi‐parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 54(3), pages 329-350, November.
    3. M. N. M. Van Lieshout & A. J. Baddeley, 1999. "Indices of Dependence Between Types in Multivariate Point Patterns," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 26(4), pages 511-532, December.
    4. Baddeley, Adrian & Turner, Rolf, 2005. "spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mousaei Sanjerehei, Mohammad, 2011. "Determination of an appropriate quadrat size and shape for detecting association between plant species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(10), pages 1790-1792.
    2. Barry Kronenfeld & Timothy Leslie, 2015. "Restricted random labeling: testing for between-group interaction after controlling for joint population and within-group spatial structure," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28, January.
    3. LeSage, James & Banerjee, Sudipto & Fischer, Manfred M. & Congdon, Peter, 2009. "Spatial statistics: Methods, models & computation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2781-2785, June.
    4. Elvan Ceyhan, 2010. "New Tests of Spatial Segregation Based on Nearest Neighbour Contingency Tables," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(1), pages 147-165, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elvan Ceyhan, 2009. "Class‐specific tests of spatial segregation based on nearest neighbor contingency tables," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 63(2), pages 149-182, May.
    2. Elvan Ceyhan, 2010. "New Tests of Spatial Segregation Based on Nearest Neighbour Contingency Tables," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(1), pages 147-165, March.
    3. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2012. "A typology of distance-based measures of spatial concentration," Working Papers halshs-00679993, HAL.
    4. D'Angelo, Nicoletta & Adelfio, Giada & Mateu, Jorge, 2023. "Locally weighted minimum contrast estimation for spatio-temporal log-Gaussian Cox processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Marcon, Eric & Puech, Florence, 2017. "A typology of distance-based measures of spatial concentration," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 56-67.
    6. Amanda S. Hering & Sean Bair, 2014. "Characterizing spatial and chronological target selection of serial offenders," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 123-140, January.
    7. Tilman M. Davies & Martin L. Hazelton, 2013. "Assessing minimum contrast parameter estimation for spatial and spatiotemporal log‐Gaussian Cox processes," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 67(4), pages 355-389, November.
    8. Marcon, Eric & Traissac, Stéphane & Puech, Florence & Lang, Gabriel, 2015. "Tools to Characterize Point Patterns: dbmss for R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(c03).
    9. Carlos Comas & Jorge Mateu & Aila Särkkä, 2010. "A third‐order point process characteristic for multi‐type point processes," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 64(1), pages 19-44, February.
    10. Laura Anton-Sanchez & Pedro Larrañaga & Ruth Benavides-Piccione & Isabel Fernaud-Espinosa & Javier DeFelipe & Concha Bielza, 2017. "Three-dimensional spatial modeling of spines along dendritic networks in human cortical pyramidal neurons," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Angelo Mazza & Antonio Punzo, 2016. "Spatial attraction in migrants' settlement patterns in the city of Catania," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(5), pages 117-138.
    12. Marj Tonini & Andrea Pedrazzini & Ivanna Penna & Michel Jaboyedoff, 2014. "Spatial pattern of landslides in Swiss Rhone Valley," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(1), pages 97-110, August.
    13. Michaela Prokešová & Jiří Dvořák & Eva B. Vedel Jensen, 2017. "Two-step estimation procedures for inhomogeneous shot-noise Cox processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(3), pages 513-542, June.
    14. O. Cronie & M. N. M. Van Lieshout, 2015. "A J -function for Inhomogeneous Spatio-temporal Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(2), pages 562-579, June.
    15. Nicoletta D’Angelo & Marianna Siino & Antonino D’Alessandro & Giada Adelfio, 2022. "Local spatial log-Gaussian Cox processes for seismic data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(4), pages 633-671, December.
    16. Jiří Dvořák & Michaela Prokešová, 2016. "Parameter Estimation for Inhomogeneous Space-Time Shot-Noise Cox Point Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(4), pages 939-961, December.
    17. Ian W. Renner & David I. Warton, 2013. "Equivalence of MAXENT and Poisson Point Process Models for Species Distribution Modeling in Ecology," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 274-281, March.
    18. Jesper Møller & Carlos Díaz‐Avalos, 2010. "Structured Spatio‐Temporal Shot‐Noise Cox Point Process Models, with a View to Modelling Forest Fires," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(1), pages 2-25, March.
    19. Gabriel Lang & Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2020. "Distance-based measures of spatial concentration: introducing a relative density function," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 64(2), pages 243-265, April.
    20. Rasmus Plenge Waagepetersen, 2007. "An Estimating Function Approach to Inference for Inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott Processes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 252-258, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:8:p:2786-2808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.