IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v146y2020ics016794732030030x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymptotic distributions and performance of empirical skewness measures

Author

Listed:
  • Eberl, Andreas
  • Klar, Bernhard

Abstract

A number of skewness measures have been proposed and applied to theoretical distributions. However, the corresponding empirical counterparts have been analyzed only rarely, especially with respect to their asymptotic properties and limit distributions. Six of these empirical measures are considered. After discussing some general properties, the limiting distribution for each measure is derived under weak assumptions. The performance of these estimators is analyzed in simulations using tests and the coverage probabilities of confidence intervals. A particular focus is put on the standardized central third moment as the most popular measure of skewness. Since it turns out to behave poorly, especially when sample sizes are small, the use of alternative and more suitable skewness measures is recommended. A real data application illustrates some of the findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Eberl, Andreas & Klar, Bernhard, 2020. "Asymptotic distributions and performance of empirical skewness measures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:146:y:2020:i:c:s016794732030030x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2020.106939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016794732030030X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2020.106939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. H. Tajuddin, 1999. "A comparison between two simple measures of skewness," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 767-774.
    2. Bellini, Fabio & Klar, Bernhard & Müller, Alfred & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2014. "Generalized quantiles as risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-48.
    3. Cedric Flecher & Denis Allard & Philippe Naveau, 2010. "Truncated skew-normal distributions: moments, estimation by weighted moments and application to climatic data," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(3), pages 331-345.
    4. Gutti Babu & C. Rao, 1992. "Expansions for statistics involving the mean absolute deviations," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 44(2), pages 387-403, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chenglu Jin & Thomas Conlon & John Cotter, 2023. "Co-Skewness across Return Horizons," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 1483-1518.
    2. Andreas Eberl & Bernhard Klar, 2023. "Stochastic orders and measures of skewness and dispersion based on expectiles," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 509-527, April.
    3. Andreas Eberl & Bernhard Klar, 2022. "Expectile‐based measures of skewness," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(1), pages 373-399, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Eberl & Bernhard Klar, 2022. "Expectile‐based measures of skewness," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(1), pages 373-399, March.
    2. Taoufik Bouezmarni & Mohamed Doukali & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2023. "Testing Granger Non-Causality in Expectiles," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2023-02, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    3. Chen, Yu & Ma, Mengyuan & Sun, Hongfang, 2023. "Statistical inference for extreme extremile in heavy-tailed heteroscedastic regression model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 142-162.
    4. Lauer, Alexandra & Zähle, Henryk, 2017. "Bootstrap consistency and bias correction in the nonparametric estimation of risk measures of collective risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 99-108.
    5. Said Khalil, 2022. "Expectile-based capital allocation," Working Papers hal-03816525, HAL.
    6. Dingshi Tian & Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang, 2018. "Econometric Modeling of Risk Measures: A Selective Review of the Recent Literature," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 201807, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Oct 2018.
    7. Qinyu Wu & Fan Yang & Ping Zhang, 2023. "Conditional generalized quantiles based on expected utility model and equivalent characterization of properties," Papers 2301.12420, arXiv.org.
    8. Maziar Sahamkhadam, 2021. "Dynamic copula-based expectile portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 209-223, May.
    9. Xia Han & Bin Wang & Ruodu Wang & Qinyu Wu, 2021. "Risk Concentration and the Mean-Expected Shortfall Criterion," Papers 2108.05066, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    10. Brenda López Cabrera & Franziska Schulz, 2017. "Forecasting Generalized Quantiles of Electricity Demand: A Functional Data Approach," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(517), pages 127-136, January.
    11. Henryk Zähle, 2022. "A concept of copula robustness and its applications in quantitative risk management," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 825-875, October.
    12. Cascos Fernández, Ignacio & Ochoa Arellano, Maicol Jesús, 2019. "Multivariate expectile trimming and the BExPlot," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 28434, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    13. Pichler, Alois & Shapiro, Alexander, 2015. "Minimal representation of insurance prices," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 184-193.
    14. Marcelo Brutti Righi, 2018. "A theory for combinations of risk measures," Papers 1807.01977, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    15. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2019. "Reverse sensitivity testing: What does it take to break the model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 654-670.
    16. Righi, Marcelo Brutti & Borenstein, Denis, 2018. "A simulation comparison of risk measures for portfolio optimization," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 105-112.
    17. Geissel Sebastian & Sass Jörn & Seifried Frank Thomas, 2018. "Optimal expected utility risk measures," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 35(1-2), pages 73-87, January.
    18. Daouia, Abdelaati & Girard, Stéphane & Stupfler, Gilles, 2018. "Tail expectile process and risk assessment," TSE Working Papers 18-944, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    19. Righi, Marcelo Brutti & Müller, Fernanda Maria & Moresco, Marlon Ruoso, 2020. "On a robust risk measurement approach for capital determination errors minimization," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 199-211.
    20. Véronique Maume-Deschamps & Didier Rullière & Khalil Said, 2017. "Multivariate Extensions Of Expectiles Risk Measures," Working Papers hal-01367277, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:146:y:2020:i:c:s016794732030030x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.