IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v105y2017icp184-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian local influence analysis of general estimating equations with nonignorable missing data

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yan-Qing
  • Tang, Nian-Sheng

Abstract

Bayesian empirical likelihood (BEL) method with missing data depends heavily on the prior specification and missing data mechanism assumptions. It is well known that the resulting Bayesian estimations and tests may be sensitive to these assumptions and observations. To this end, a Bayesian local influence procedure is proposed to assess the effect of various perturbations to the individual observations, priors, estimating equations (EEs) and missing data mechanism in general EEs with nonignorable missing data. A perturbation model is introduced to simultaneously characterize various perturbations, and a Bayesian perturbation manifold is constructed to characterize the intrinsic structure of these perturbations. The first- and second-order adjusted local influence measures are developed to quantify the effect of various perturbations. The proposed methods are adopted to systematically investigate the tenability of nonignorable missing mechanism assumption, the sensitivity of the choice of the nonresponse instrumental variable and the sensitivity of EEs assumption, and goodness-of-fit statistics are presented to assess the plausibility of the posited EEs. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the performance of the proposed methodologies. An example is analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yan-Qing & Tang, Nian-Sheng, 2017. "Bayesian local influence analysis of general estimating equations with nonignorable missing data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 184-200.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:184-200
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.08.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947316301918
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2016.08.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sik-Yum Lee, 2006. "Bayesian Analysis of Nonlinear Structural Equation Models with Nonignorable Missing Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 541-564, September.
    2. Kai-Tai Fang & Rahul Mukerjee, 2006. "Empirical-type likelihoods allowing posterior credible sets with frequentist validity: Higher-order asymptotics," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(3), pages 723-733, September.
    3. Hongtu Zhu & Joseph G. Ibrahim & Niansheng Tang & Heping Zhang, 2008. "Diagnostic measures for empirical likelihood of general estimating equations," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(2), pages 489-507.
    4. Hong‐Tu Zhu & Sik‐Yum Lee, 2001. "Local influence for incomplete data models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 111-126.
    5. Hongtu Zhu & Joseph G. Ibrahim & Niansheng Tang, 2011. "Bayesian influence analysis: a geometric approach," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(2), pages 307-323.
    6. Antonio R. Linero & Michael J. Daniels, 2015. "A Flexible Bayesian Approach to Monotone Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies With Nonignorable Missingness With Application to an Acute Schizophrenia Clinical Trial," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 45-55, March.
    7. Nicole A. Lazar, 2003. "Bayesian empirical likelihood," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(2), pages 319-326, June.
    8. Jiang, Depeng & Zhao, Puying & Tang, Niansheng, 2016. "A propensity score adjustment method for regression models with nonignorable missing covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 98-119.
    9. Kim, Jae Kwang & Yu, Cindy Long, 2011. "A Semiparametric Estimation of Mean Functionals With Nonignorable Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 157-165.
    10. Sheng Wang & Jun Shao & Jae Kwang Kim, "undated". "An Instrumental Variable Approach for Identification and Estimation with Nonignorable Nonresponse," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a9593fac2c9746f486d2162f9, Mathematica Policy Research.
    11. J. Chen, 2002. "Using empirical likelihood methods to obtain range restricted weights in regression estimators for surveys," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(1), pages 230-237, March.
    12. repec:mpr:mprres:8160 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. In Hong Chang & Rahul Mukerjee, 2008. "Bayesian and frequentist confidence intervals arising from empirical-type likelihoods," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(1), pages 139-147.
    14. Zhao, Hui & Zhao, Pu-Ying & Tang, Nian-Sheng, 2013. "Empirical likelihood inference for mean functionals with nonignorably missing response data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 101-116.
    15. W.‐Y. Poon & Y. S. Poon, 1999. "Conformal normal curvature and assessment of local influence," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 51-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuanyuan Ju & Yan Yang & Mingxing Hu & Lin Dai & Liucang Wu, 2022. "Bayesian Influence Analysis of the Skew-Normal Spatial Autoregression Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaowen Dai & Libin Jin & Maozai Tian & Lei Shi, 2019. "Bayesian Local Influence for Spatial Autoregressive Models with Heteroscedasticity," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(5), pages 1423-1446, October.
    2. Rong Tang & Yun Yang, 2022. "Bayesian inference for risk minimization via exponentially tilted empirical likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1257-1286, September.
    3. Vasconcellos, Klaus L.P. & Zea Fernandez, L.M., 2009. "Influence analysis with homogeneous linear restrictions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(11), pages 3787-3794, September.
    4. Cui, Li-E & Zhao, Puying & Tang, Niansheng, 2022. "Generalized empirical likelihood for nonsmooth estimating equations with missing data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    5. Guo, Xu & Song, Lianlian & Fang, Yun & Zhu, Lixing, 2019. "Model checking for general linear regression with nonignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-12.
    6. Fu, Ying-Zi & Tang, Nian-Sheng & Chen, Xing, 2009. "Local influence analysis of nonlinear structural equation models with nonignorable missing outcomes from reproductive dispersion models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3671-3684, August.
    7. Tang, Nian-Sheng & Duan, Xing-De, 2014. "Bayesian influence analysis of generalized partial linear mixed models for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 86-99.
    8. Alejandra Tapia & Victor Leiva & Maria del Pilar Diaz & Viviana Giampaoli, 2019. "Influence diagnostics in mixed effects logistic regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 920-942, September.
    9. Russo, Cibele M. & Paula, Gilberto A. & Aoki, Reiko, 2009. "Influence diagnostics in nonlinear mixed-effects elliptical models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4143-4156, October.
    10. Kai Yang & Xue Ding & Xiaohui Yuan, 2022. "Bayesian empirical likelihood inference and order shrinkage for autoregressive models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 97-121, February.
    11. Sanjay Chaudhuri & Debashis Mondal & Teng Yin, 2017. "Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling in Bayesian empirical likelihood computation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 293-320, January.
    12. Tang, Niansheng & Wang, Wenjun, 2019. "Robust estimation of generalized estimating equations with finite mixture correlation matrices and missing covariates at random for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 640-655.
    13. Xiaowen Dai & Libin Jin & Lei Shi & Cuiping Yang & Shuangzhe Liu, 2016. "Local influence analysis in general spatial models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 100(3), pages 313-331, July.
    14. R.A.B. Assumpção & M.A. Uribe-Opazo & M. Galea, 2014. "Analysis of local influence in geostatistics using Student's t -distribution," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(11), pages 2323-2341, November.
    15. Lee, Sik-Yum & Lu, Bin & Song, Xin-Yuan, 2006. "Assessing local influence for nonlinear structural equation models with ignorable missing data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(5), pages 1356-1377, March.
    16. Fernanda De Bastiani & Audrey Mariz de Aquino Cysneiros & Miguel Uribe-Opazo & Manuel Galea, 2015. "Influence diagnostics in elliptical spatial linear models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(2), pages 322-340, June.
    17. Jiang, Depeng & Zhao, Puying & Tang, Niansheng, 2016. "A propensity score adjustment method for regression models with nonignorable missing covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 98-119.
    18. Chang, In Hong & Mukerjee, Rahul, 2010. "Highest posterior density regions with approximate frequentist validity: The role of data-dependent priors," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(23-24), pages 1791-1797, December.
    19. Shi, Lei & Lu, Jun & Zhao, Jianhua & Chen, Gemai, 2016. "Case deletion diagnostics for GMM estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 176-191.
    20. Jun Lu & Wen Gan & Lei Shi, 2022. "Local influence analysis for GMM estimation," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(1), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:184-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.