IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v151y2021ics096007792100583x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of social exclusion and punishment in promoting cooperation: Who should play the leading role?

Author

Listed:
  • Quan, Ji
  • Pu, Zhenjuan
  • Wang, Xianjia

Abstract

Pro-social exclusion and punishment are effective strategies in preventing free-riding. Recent literature has demonstrated that when exclusion and punishment coexist, the former is more effective to promote cooperation. However, when exclusion and punishment coexist, it is inefficient from the perspective of social welfare for them to take effect at the same time. Furthermore, it is also unrealistic for ousted defectors to pay a fine as punishment. Inspired by this observation, we propose a new concept of playing the leading role in this study. Specifically, when punishment plays the leading role—punishers dominate, excluders in the same group act as pure cooperators; and vice versa. We compare the two cases in which exclusion or punishment plays the leading role in turn in sanctioning defectors. The evolutionary stable state of the system under different parameter spaces and the phase transition processes of the system between different states are analyzed. We find that in the case where exclusion plays the leading role, all parameter regions for the system to reach a fully cooperative state are significantly expanded. Moreover, under the same parameter values, the ratio of defectors when exclusion plays the leading role is always lower than that when exclusion plays the leading role. Thus, we can conclude that exclusion playing the leading role is more conducive to the evolution of cooperation. These results allow us to compare the effects of exclusion and punishment in promoting cooperation from another perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan, Ji & Pu, Zhenjuan & Wang, Xianjia, 2021. "Comparison of social exclusion and punishment in promoting cooperation: Who should play the leading role?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:151:y:2021:i:c:s096007792100583x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096007792100583X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kamei, Kenju, 2014. "Conditional punishment," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 199-202.
    2. Li, Hui-Jia & Wang, Qian & Liu, Shenfeng & Hu, Jun, 2020. "Exploring the trust management mechanism in self-organizing complex network based on game theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 542(C).
    3. Niu, Xiaotong & Xu, Jiwei & Deng, Zhenghong, 2017. "Conditional punishment resolves social dilemma in spatial network," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 256-259.
    4. Dominic D. P. Johnson & Pavel Stopka & Stephen Knights, 2003. "The puzzle of human cooperation," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6926), pages 911-912, February.
    5. Gao, Jia & Li, Zhi & Cong, Rui & Wang, Long, 2012. "Tolerance-based punishment in continuous public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(16), pages 4111-4120.
    6. Quan, Ji & Yang, Wenjun & Li, Xia & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Social exclusion with dynamic cost on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    7. Szolnoki, Attila & Chen, Xiaojie, 2020. "Strategy dependent learning activity in cyclic dominant systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Quan, Ji & Zheng, Junjun & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Xiukang, 2019. "The effect of increasing returns to scale in public goods investment on threshold values of cooperation under social exclusion mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 532(C).
    9. Laurent Denant-Boemont & David Masclet & Charles Noussair, 2007. "Punishment, counterpunishment and sanction enforcement in a social dilemma experiment," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 33(1), pages 145-167, October.
    10. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Reputation evaluation with tolerance and reputation-dependent imitation on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Wang, Xu-Wen & Nie, Sen & Jiang, Luo-Luo & Wang, Bing-Hong & Chen, Shi-Ming, 2017. "Role of delay-based reward in the spatial cooperation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 153-158.
    12. Zhang, Shuhua & Zhang, Zhipeng & Wu, Yu’e & Yan, Ming & Xie, Yunya, 2018. "Tolerance-based punishment and cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 267-272.
    13. Dirk Helbing & Attila Szolnoki & Matjaž Perc & György Szabó, 2010. "Evolutionary Establishment of Moral and Double Moral Standards through Spatial Interactions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-9, April.
    14. Zhang, Hong & Ye, Hang, 2016. "Role of perception cost in tag-mediated cooperation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 279(C), pages 76-89.
    15. Karl Sigmund & Hannelore De Silva & Arne Traulsen & Christoph Hauert, 2010. "Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7308), pages 861-863, August.
    16. Timothy Cason & Lata Gangadharan, 2015. "Promoting cooperation in nonlinear social dilemmas through peer punishment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(1), pages 66-88, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Hsuan-Wei & Cleveland, Colin & Szolnoki, Attila, 2023. "Group-size dependent synergy in heterogeneous populations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Lee, Hsuan-Wei & Cleveland, Colin & Szolnoki, Attila, 2023. "Restoring spatial cooperation with myopic agents in a three-strategy social dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 458(C).
    3. Quan, Ji & Dong, Xu & Wang, Xianjia, 2022. "Rational conformity behavior in social learning promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 425(C).
    4. Bi, Yan & Yang, Hui, 2023. "Based on reputation consistent strategy times promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 444(C).
    5. Ma, Xiaojian & Quan, Ji & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Evolution of cooperation with nonlinear environment feedback in repeated public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 452(C).
    6. Quan, Ji & Yu, Junyu & Li, Xia & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Conditional switching between social excluders and loners promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Lee, Hsuan-Wei & Cleveland, Colin & Szolnoki, Attila, 2022. "Mercenary punishment in structured populations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 417(C).
    8. Szolnoki, Attila & Chen, Xiaojie, 2022. "Tactical cooperation of defectors in a multi-stage public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    9. de Oliveira, Breno F. & Szolnoki, Attila, 2022. "Competition among alliances of different sizes," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quan, Ji & Yang, Wenjun & Li, Xia & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Social exclusion with dynamic cost on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    2. Lv, Ran & Qian, Jia-Li & Hao, Qing-Yi & Wu, Chao-Yun & Guo, Ning & Ling, Xiang, 2023. "The impact of current and historical reputation with non-uniform change on cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    3. Wang, Mie & Kang, HongWei & Shen, Yong & Sun, XingPing & Chen, QingYi, 2021. "The role of alliance cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Quan, Ji & Tang, Caixia & Wang, Xianjia, 2021. "Reputation-based discount effect in imitation on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).
    5. Quan, Ji & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Evidential reasoning based on imitation and aspiration information in strategy learning promotes cooperation in optional spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Qian, Jun & Zhang, Tongda & Zhang, Yingfeng & Chai, Yueting & Sun, Xiao & Wang, Zhen, 2023. "The construction of peer punishment preference: how central power shapes prosocial and antisocial punishment behaviors," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 442(C).
    7. Zheng, Junjun & Ren, Tianyu & Ma, Gang & Dong, Jinhui, 2021. "The emergence and implementation of pool exclusion in spatial public goods game with heterogeneous ability-to-pay," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 394(C).
    8. Quan, Ji & Dong, Xu & Wang, Xianjia, 2022. "Rational conformity behavior in social learning promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 425(C).
    9. Quan, Ji & Yu, Junyu & Li, Xia & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Conditional switching between social excluders and loners promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    10. Alexander Isakov & David Rand, 2012. "The Evolution of Coercive Institutional Punishment," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 97-109, March.
    11. Yunsheng Deng & Jihui Zhang, 2022. "The choice-decision based on memory and payoff favors cooperation in stag hunt game on interdependent networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(2), pages 1-13, February.
    12. Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2012. "Promoting Cooperation: the Distribution of Reward and Punishment Power," Discussion Papers 2012-08, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    13. Luo-Luo Jiang & Matjaž Perc & Attila Szolnoki, 2013. "If Cooperation Is Likely Punish Mildly: Insights from Economic Experiments Based on the Snowdrift Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-7, May.
    14. Ohdaira, Tetsushi, 2017. "Characteristics of the evolution of cooperation by the probabilistic peer-punishment based on the difference of payoff," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 77-83.
    15. Isamu Okada, 2020. "A Review of Theoretical Studies on Indirect Reciprocity," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Qiang Wang & Linjie Liu & Xiaojie Chen, 2020. "Evolutionary Dynamics of Cooperation in the Public Goods Game with Individual Disguise and Peer Punishment," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 764-782, September.
    17. Quan, Ji & Zhou, Yawen & Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2020. "Information fusion based on reputation and payoff promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    18. Zhuang, Qian & Wang, Dong & Fan, Ying & Di, Zengru, 2012. "Evolution of cooperation in a heterogeneous population with influential individuals," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(4), pages 1735-1741.
    19. Zhenghong Wu & Huan Huang & Qinghu Liao, 2021. "The study on the role of dedicators on promoting cooperation in public goods game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Kamei, Kenju & Tabero, Katy, 2021. "The Individual-Team Discontinuity Effect on Institutional Choices: Experimental Evidence in Voluntary Public Goods Provision," MPRA Paper 112106, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:151:y:2021:i:c:s096007792100583x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.