IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v137y2020ics0960077920302939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hysteresis and disorder-induced order in continuous kinetic-like opinion dynamics in complex networks

Author

Listed:
  • Oestereich, A.L.
  • Pires, M.A.
  • Duarte Queirós, S.M.
  • Crokidakis, N.

Abstract

We analyse how the interplay between several sources of heterogeneity in agent’s bias, namely plurality and polarization, shapes the emergence of different regimes of collective opinion in multi-agent systems. We do so by considering a kinetic-like model of opinion dynamics with restrictive pairwise interactions — which are modeled by a smooth bounded confidence — in a networked population endued with quenched plurality and polarization. The former is understood as gradation around some leading opinion whereas the latter means formal disagreement. Our results are able to reproduce the so-called ‘social hysteresis’ phenomenon, i.e., the outcome of a given collective decision process depends on the history of that society, as well as heterogeneity-assisted ordering, that is to say, the achievement of an agreement assumed in the form of a collective stance. In addition, we show that those results are qualitatively independent of the type of network architecture considered, specifically random, small-world or scale-free.

Suggested Citation

  • Oestereich, A.L. & Pires, M.A. & Duarte Queirós, S.M. & Crokidakis, N., 2020. "Hysteresis and disorder-induced order in continuous kinetic-like opinion dynamics in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:137:y:2020:i:c:s0960077920302939
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077920302939
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rainer Hegselmann & Ulrich Krause, 2002. "Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Models, Analysis and Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5(3), pages 1-2.
    2. Serge Galam, 2008. "Sociophysics: A Review Of Galam Models," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 409-440.
    3. Galam, Serge, 1997. "Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at T = 0," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 66-80.
    4. Encinas, J.M. & Chen, Hanshuang & de Oliveira, Marcelo M. & Fiore, Carlos E., 2019. "Majority vote model with ancillary noise in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 516(C), pages 563-570.
    5. Jędrzejewski, Arkadiusz & Sznajd-Weron, Katarzyna, 2018. "Impact of memory on opinion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 306-315.
    6. C. J. Tessone & R. Toral, 2009. "Diversity-induced resonance in a model for opinion formation," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 71(4), pages 549-555, October.
    7. Guillaume Deffuant & David Neau & Frederic Amblard & Gérard Weisbuch, 2000. "Mixing beliefs among interacting agents," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(01n04), pages 87-98.
    8. Gambaro, Joao Paulo & Crokidakis, Nuno, 2017. "The influence of contrarians in the dynamics of opinion formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 486(C), pages 465-472.
    9. Bartłomiej Nowak & Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron, 2019. "Homogeneous Symmetrical Threshold Model with Nonconformity: Independence versus Anticonformity," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oestereich, André L. & Crokidakis, Nuno & Cajueiro, Daniel O., 2022. "Impact of memory and bias in kinetic exchange opinion models on random networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).
    2. Maia, H.P. & Ferreira, S.C. & Martins, M.L., 2021. "Adaptive network approach for emergence of societal bubbles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    3. Oestereich, André L. & Pires, Marcelo A. & Crokidakis, Nuno & Cajueiro, Daniel O., 2023. "Optimal rewiring in adaptive networks in multi-coupled vaccination, epidemic and opinion dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiwari, Mukesh & Yang, Xiguang & Sen, Surajit, 2021. "Modeling the nonlinear effects of opinion kinematics in elections: A simple Ising model with random field based study," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    2. Bartłomiej Nowak & Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron, 2019. "Homogeneous Symmetrical Threshold Model with Nonconformity: Independence versus Anticonformity," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, April.
    3. Oestereich, André L. & Crokidakis, Nuno & Cajueiro, Daniel O., 2022. "Impact of memory and bias in kinetic exchange opinion models on random networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).
    4. María Cecilia Gimenez & Luis Reinaudi & Ana Pamela Paz-García & Paulo Marcelo Centres & Antonio José Ramirez-Pastor, 2021. "Opinion evolution in the presence of constant propaganda: homogeneous and localized cases," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(1), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Toth, Gabor & Galam, Serge, 2022. "Deviations from the majority: A local flip model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. AskariSichani, Omid & Jalili, Mahdi, 2015. "Influence maximization of informed agents in social networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 254(C), pages 229-239.
    7. Agnieszka Kowalska-Styczeń & Krzysztof Malarz, 2020. "Noise induced unanimity and disorder in opinion formation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Wang, Chaoqian, 2021. "Opinion dynamics with bilateral propaganda and unilateral information blockade," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 566(C).
    9. Muslim, Roni & Wella, Sasfan A. & Nugraha, Ahmad R.T., 2022. "Phase transition in the majority rule model with the nonconformist agents," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 608(P2).
    10. Takesue, Hirofumi, 2023. "Relative opinion similarity leads to the emergence of large clusters in opinion formation models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 622(C).
    11. Catherine A. Glass & David H. Glass, 2021. "Social Influence of Competing Groups and Leaders in Opinion Dynamics," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(3), pages 799-823, October.
    12. Makoto Fujii, 2022. "Simulations of the Diffusion of Innovation by Trust–Distrust Model Focusing on the Network Structure," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 527-544, October.
    13. Pérez-Llanos, Mayte & Pinasco, Juan Pablo & Saintier, Nicolas, 2020. "Opinion attractiveness and its effect in opinion formation models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).
    14. Pedraza, Lucía & Pinasco, Juan Pablo & Semeshenko, Viktoriya & Balenzuela, Pablo, 2023. "Mesoscopic analytical approach in a three state opinion model with continuous internal variable," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    15. Shang, Lihui & Zhao, Mingming & Ai, Jun & Su, Zhan, 2021. "Opinion evolution in the Sznajd model on interdependent chains," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    16. Lu, Xi & Mo, Hongming & Deng, Yong, 2015. "An evidential opinion dynamics model based on heterogeneous social influential power," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 98-107.
    17. Andreas Koulouris & Ioannis Katerelos & Theodore Tsekeris, 2013. "Multi-Equilibria Regulation Agent-Based Model of Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 11(1), pages 51-70.
    18. Serge Galam, 2016. "The invisible hand and the rational agent are behind bubbles and crashes," Papers 1601.02990, arXiv.org.
    19. Huang, Changwei & Hou, Yongzhao & Han, Wenchen, 2023. "Coevolution of consensus and cooperation in evolutionary Hegselmann–Krause dilemma with the cooperation cost," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Guillaume Deffuant & Ilaria Bertazzi & Sylvie Huet, 2018. "The Dark Side Of Gossips: Hints From A Simple Opinion Dynamics Model," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06n07), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:137:y:2020:i:c:s0960077920302939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.