IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v117y2018icp21-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodological framework for vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems under deliberate attacks

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Shuliang
  • Stanley, H. Eugene
  • Gao, Yachun

Abstract

In this paper, we give a methodological framework to analyze vulnerability of interdependent infrastructure systems under deliberate attacks. Meanwhile, the intelligence of attackers is considered and a method of critical attack area identification according to community detection is proposed as well. The Interdependent power and gas system in Wuhan, China is taken as the example. We determine the vulnerabilities of different critical areas in both independent and interdependent scenarios. In the meantime, percolation theory are utilized and different coupling strengths are considered to further analyze the vulnerabilities. It is found that the disruption of only a few vertices may lead to complete collapsing for some critical areas and the vulnerabilities increase when systems become interdependent. Therefore, greater protection should be given to critical areas of a network in order to reduce the vulnerabilities when deliberate attacks occur. The proposed method could help decision makers develop mitigation techniques and optimal protection strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Shuliang & Stanley, H. Eugene & Gao, Yachun, 2018. "A methodological framework for vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems under deliberate attacks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 21-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:21-29
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2018.10.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077918310002
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.10.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Utne, I.B. & Hokstad, P. & Vatn, J., 2011. "A method for risk modeling of interdependencies in critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 671-678.
    2. Wang, Jianwei & Li, Yun & Zheng, Qiaofang, 2015. "Cascading load model in interdependent networks with coupled strength," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 430(C), pages 242-253.
    3. Hong, Liu & Yan, Yongze & Ouyang, Min & Tian, Hui & He, Xiaozheng, 2017. "Vulnerability effects of passengers' intermodal transfer distance preference and subway expansion on complementary urban public transportation systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 58-72.
    4. Terje Aven, 2011. "On Some Recent Definitions and Analysis Frameworks for Risk, Vulnerability, and Resilience," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 515-522, April.
    5. Gerald Brown & Matthew Carlyle & Javier Salmerón & Kevin Wood, 2006. "Defending Critical Infrastructure," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 530-544, December.
    6. Hong, Liu & Ouyang, Min & Peeta, Srinivas & He, Xiaozheng & Yan, Yongze, 2015. "Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 58-68.
    7. Ouyang, Min, 2016. "Critical location identification and vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 106-116.
    8. Ouyang, Min & Zhao, Lijing & Pan, Zhezhe & Hong, Liu, 2014. "Comparisons of complex network based models and direct current power flow model to analyze power grid vulnerability under intentional attacks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 403(C), pages 45-53.
    9. Ouyang, Min & Zhao, Lijing & Hong, Liu & Pan, Zhezhe, 2014. "Comparisons of complex network based models and real train flow model to analyze Chinese railway vulnerability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 38-46.
    10. Ouyang, Min, 2014. "Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-60.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Gaolin & Zhou, Shuming & Li, Min & Zhang, Hong, 2022. "Evaluation of community vulnerability based on communicability and structural dissimilarity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    2. Wen, Tao & Deng, Yong, 2020. "The vulnerability of communities in complex networks: An entropy approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Shuliang & Zhang, Jianhua & Zhao, Mingwei & Min, Xu, 2017. "Vulnerability analysis and critical areas identification of the power systems under terrorist attacks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 156-165.
    2. Ouyang, Min, 2017. "A mathematical framework to optimize resilience of interdependent critical infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1072-1084.
    3. Hong, Liu & Ye, Bowen & Yan, Han & Zhang, Hui & Ouyang, Min & (Sean) He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Spatiotemporal vulnerability analysis of railway systems with heterogeneous train flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 725-744.
    4. Wang, Shuliang & Zhang, Jianhua & Yue, Xin, 2018. "Multiple robustness assessment method for understanding structural and functional characteristics of the power network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 261-270.
    5. Hong, Liu & Yan, Yongze & Ouyang, Min & Tian, Hui & He, Xiaozheng, 2017. "Vulnerability effects of passengers' intermodal transfer distance preference and subway expansion on complementary urban public transportation systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 58-72.
    6. Ouyang, Min & Pan, ZheZhe & Hong, Liu & He, Yue, 2015. "Vulnerability analysis of complementary transportation systems with applications to railway and airline systems in China," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 248-257.
    7. Min Ouyang & Hui Tian & Zhenghua Wang & Liu Hong & Zijun Mao, 2019. "Critical Infrastructure Vulnerability to Spatially Localized Failures with Applications to Chinese Railway System," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 180-194, January.
    8. Ouyang, Min & Liu, Chuang & Wu, Shengyu, 2020. "Worst-case vulnerability assessment and mitigation model of urban utility tunnels," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Zhao, Chen & Li, Nan & Fang, Dongping, 2018. "Criticality assessment of urban interdependent lifeline systems using a biased PageRank algorithm and a multilayer weighted directed network model," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 100-112.
    10. Galvan, Giulio & Agarwal, Jitendra, 2020. "Assessing the vulnerability of infrastructure networks based on distribution measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    11. Han, Lin & Zhao, Xudong & Chen, Zhilong & Gong, Huadong & Hou, Benwei, 2021. "Assessing resilience of urban lifeline networks to intentional attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    12. Yi‐Ping Fang & Giovanni Sansavini & Enrico Zio, 2019. "An Optimization‐Based Framework for the Identification of Vulnerabilities in Electric Power Grids Exposed to Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1949-1969, September.
    13. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    14. Hassan Al-Zarooni & Hamdi Bashir, 2020. "An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for modeling and analyzing electrical power system network interdependencies," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1204-1226, December.
    15. Chao Fang & Piao Dong & Yi-Ping Fang & Enrico Zio, 2020. "Vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructure under disruptions: An application to China Railway High-speed," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 235-245, April.
    16. Ying Wang & Xiangmei Li & Jiangfeng Li & Zhengdong Huang & Renbin Xiao, 2018. "Impact of Rapid Urbanization on Vulnerability of Land System from Complex Networks View: A Methodological Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-18, May.
    17. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    18. Liang, Shidong & Zhang, Hu & Fang, Zhiming & He, Shengxue & Zhao, Jing & Leng, Rongmeng & Ma, Minghui, 2022. "Optimal control to improve reliability of demand responsive transport priority at signalized intersections considering the stochastic process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    19. Goldbeck, Nils & Angeloudis, Panagiotis & Ochieng, Washington Y., 2019. "Resilience assessment for interdependent urban infrastructure systems using dynamic network flow models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 62-79.
    20. Ouyang, Min & Wang, Zhenghua, 2015. "Resilience assessment of interdependent infrastructure systems: With a focus on joint restoration modeling and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 74-82.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:21-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.