IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v359y2024ics0306261924000679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel method for predicting shallow hydrocarbon accumulation based on source-fault-sand (S-F-Sd) evaluation and ensemble neural network (ENN)

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Fuwei
  • Chen, Dongxia
  • Li, Meijun
  • Chen, Zhangxin
  • Wang, Qiaochu
  • Jiang, Mengya
  • Rong, Lanxi
  • Wang, Yuqi
  • Li, Sha
  • Iltaf, Khawaja Hasnain
  • Wanma, Renzeng
  • Liu, Chen

Abstract

Shallow hydrocarbon accumulation (SHA) and predrilling volume prediction are important components of offshore oil and gas exploration. However, SHA prediction is complex and involves geological and technical uncertainties. Despite advances in available technology, reliable and convenient methods for predicting SHA are urgently needed by oil companies to avoid costly drilling mistakes. This study proposes a novel method for SHA prediction by combining source–fault–sand (S-F-Sd) evaluation and ensemble neural network (ENN) algorithms. First, twelve main controlling factors affecting SHA, which predominantly included geological parameters related to source rocks (S), fault zones (F) and sandstone reservoirs (Sd), were screened and quantified. Second, the six principal components obtained after the dimensionality reduction of the main control factors were selected as the model inputs. Then, using the BP neural network (BPNN), bagged neural network ensemble (Bagged-NNE) and boosted neural network ensemble (Boosted-NNE) algorithms, three different SHA prediction models with hydrocarbon column height (HCH) as the output were constructed. These models were applied to the K gasfield in the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin, to evaluate and optimize the model performance. Finally, the variable importance and the possible uncertainties in SHA prediction were discussed. The results show that the Boosted-NNE model is superior to the Bagged-NNE and BPNN models in SHA prediction. Moreover, the geological reserves of sandstone reservoirs calculated using the predicted HCH are close to the existing evaluation, which proves the effectiveness of the model output. In terms of variable importance, the synthetic parameters F1, F2, F5 and F4 obtained after dimensionality reduction are the four top principal components contributing to the model output. Under single-factor control, the HCH is positively correlated with the hydrocarbon expulsion rate, shale gouge ratio, sandstone thickness, porosity and permeability, but the relationship between the HCH and other controlling factors tends to be complicated. In addition, the model accuracy is affected by the uncertainties arising from the quantification and screening of the main controlling factors, as well as the dataset size and the machine learning algorithm selection. This contribution provides a reliable method for SHA prediction and corresponding predrilling volume evaluation, which can help avoid costly drilling mistakes and advance intelligent exploration techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Fuwei & Chen, Dongxia & Li, Meijun & Chen, Zhangxin & Wang, Qiaochu & Jiang, Mengya & Rong, Lanxi & Wang, Yuqi & Li, Sha & Iltaf, Khawaja Hasnain & Wanma, Renzeng & Liu, Chen, 2024. "A novel method for predicting shallow hydrocarbon accumulation based on source-fault-sand (S-F-Sd) evaluation and ensemble neural network (ENN)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:359:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924000679
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924000679
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:359:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924000679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.