IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v356y2024ics0306261923017725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of epistemic uncertainty on tradeoff in model-based decision support for methane hydrate development system design

Author

Listed:
  • Suzuki, Kenya
  • Wada, Ryota
  • Konno, Yoshihiro
  • Hiekata, Kazuo
  • Nanjo, Takashi
  • Nagakubo, Sadao

Abstract

Global decarbonization trends encouraged the consideration of a methane hydrate (MH) development system design combined with carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the Japanese national MH research program. Previous studies have also proposed decarbonized MH development systems, but the conclusions vary due to epistemic uncertainty. Epistemic uncertainty arises from the knowledge and understanding of the subject, and each expert has different assumptions. Therefore, we assume that developing a model encompassing epistemic uncertainty as a platform allows for discussion toward system design decisions. This study builds the evaluation model, considering epistemic uncertainty to support the decision-making on the system design and reveal the tradeoff. It identifies the epistemic uncertainty affecting the tradeoff by changing the conditions based on previous studies. The evaluation model consists of technological options as modules, and all system concepts are evaluated by combining them. Epistemic uncertainty was subdivided and implemented within the evaluation model. As a result, the evaluation model output the tradeoff with bands of uncertainty. While the development field significantly impacts the results, hydrogen-related systems and offshore power plant systems score well owing to synergies between options. The epistemic uncertainty analysis regarding the tradeoff suggests that system design uncertainty impacts the conclusions. This finding indicates the importance of the model development as a platform for the evaluation of various system designs. This study contributed to an approach to model-based decision-making with epistemic uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzuki, Kenya & Wada, Ryota & Konno, Yoshihiro & Hiekata, Kazuo & Nanjo, Takashi & Nagakubo, Sadao, 2024. "Impact of epistemic uncertainty on tradeoff in model-based decision support for methane hydrate development system design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:356:y:2024:i:c:s0306261923017725
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923017725
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:356:y:2024:i:c:s0306261923017725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.