IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v18y1984i4p261-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lay views of energy conservation in Britain: The significant case of primary school teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Cooper, Ian

Abstract

How and what do British primary school teachers think about conserving energy? This paper contains a limited, but detailed, attempt to answer this question. This is presented by reporting a case study of views expressed by staff in ten different schools in one particular local education authority. Government in Britain has aspirations that children should be encouraged through their formal schooling to adopt pro-conservation attitudes and behaviour. Teachers' own responses to conservation may be of significance as to whether this will happen. It is concluded that the teachers investigated do not, at present, spontaneously cast themselves in the rôle which government wishes them to play. Moreover, they also tend to hold a definition of [`]energy conservation' which stands at variance with that which predominates among local and central government officials. This divergence in the meanings they attribute to the phrase may make it difficult for these two groups to agree about the circumstances in which energy should be conserved, both in school buildings and elsewhere.

Suggested Citation

  • Cooper, Ian, 1984. "Lay views of energy conservation in Britain: The significant case of primary school teachers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 261-300.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:18:y:1984:i:4:p:261-300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306-2619(84)90010-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:18:y:1984:i:4:p:261-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.