IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v13y1983i3p215-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Econometric analysis of regional labour productivity in US coal mines: 1950-1975

Author

Listed:
  • Lakhani, Hyder G.

Abstract

Changes in labour productivity can bring about economic growth or decline of a region. The factors that explain increases or decreases in labour productivity, if identified, can help policy makers control them so as to mitigate explosive changes in productivity and their concomitant effects on the utilisation of capital, employment, prices, welfare payments and social services. This paper attempts to identify these variables for five coal-producing regions in the US. Section 2 describes these regions, identifies the relevant variables and presents an econometric methodology of regression equations for underground and surface mines. These variables are the non-captive mines, continuous mining technologies in underground mines and medium- and large-sized power shovels and draglines in surface mines, capacity utilisation, accident rates and mining regulations. The literature on regional labour productivity is critically reviewed in Section 3 and it is concluded that none of the five available studies help in comparing inter-regional productivity of labour. Section 4 presents empirical results of equations estimated for underground and surface mines and concludes that the selected variables explained variation in labour productivity significantly. In particular, the results revealed that the regional variations in productivity were explained by technological changes, mine ownership and regulatory laws passed by the Federal and the State governments.

Suggested Citation

  • Lakhani, Hyder G., 1983. "Econometric analysis of regional labour productivity in US coal mines: 1950-1975," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 215-239, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:13:y:1983:i:3:p:215-239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306-2619(83)90010-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:13:y:1983:i:3:p:215-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.