IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v97y2010i10p1517-1526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial analysis of soil surface hydraulic properties: Is infiltration method dependent?

Author

Listed:
  • Mubarak, Ibrahim
  • Angulo-Jaramillo, Rafael
  • Mailhol, Jean Claude
  • Ruelle, Pierre
  • Khaledian, Mohammadreza
  • Vauclin, Michel

Abstract

The management of irrigated agricultural fields requires reliable information about soil hydraulic properties and their spatio-temporal variability. The spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity, Ks and the alpha-parameter [alpha]vG-2007 of the van Genuchten equation was reviewed on an agricultural loamy soil after a 17-year period of repeated conventional agricultural practices for tillage and planting. The Beerkan infiltration method and its algorithm BEST were used to characterize the soil through the van Genuchten and Brooks and Corey equations. Forty field measurements were made at each node of a 6 m x 7.5 m grid. The soil hydraulic properties and their spatial structure were compared to those recorded in 1990 on the same field soil, through the exponential form of the soil hydraulic conductivity given by the Gardner equation, using the Guelph Pressure Infiltrometer technique. No significant differences in the results obtained in 1990 and 2007 were observed for either particle-size distribution or dry bulk density. The mean value of [alpha]vG-2007 was found to be identical to that of [alpha]G-1990, while that of Ks-2007 was significantly smaller than that of Ks-1990. In contrast to the Gardner equation, the van Genuchten/Brooks and Corey expression was found to be more representative of a well-graded particle-size distribution of a loamy soil. The geostatistical analysis showed the two parameters, Ks and [alpha]vG-2007, were autocorrelated up to about 30 and 21 m, respectively, as well as spatially positively correlated within a range of 30 m. Despite the difference in the mean values of Ks between the two studies, the spatial structures were similar to those found in the 1990 experiment except for the covariance sign. The similarity in autocorrelation ranges indicate that the spatial analysis of soil hydraulic properties is independent of the infiltration methods (i.e., measurement of an infiltration flux) used in the two studies, while the difference in the covariance sign may be linked to the use of two different techniques of soil hydraulic parameterization. The covariance values found in the 2007 campaign indicates a positive relationship between the two parameters, Ks and [alpha]vG-2007. The spatial correlations of soil hydraulic parameters appear to be temporally stabilized, at least within the agro-pedo-climatic context of the study. This may be attributed to the soil textural properties which remain constant in time and to the structural properties which are constantly renewed by the cyclic agricultural practices. However, further experiments are needed to strengthen this result.

Suggested Citation

  • Mubarak, Ibrahim & Angulo-Jaramillo, Rafael & Mailhol, Jean Claude & Ruelle, Pierre & Khaledian, Mohammadreza & Vauclin, Michel, 2010. "Spatial analysis of soil surface hydraulic properties: Is infiltration method dependent?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1517-1526, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:10:p:1517-1526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(10)00160-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nie, Wei-Bo & Dong, Shu-Xin & Li, Yi-Bo & Ma, Xiao-Yi, 2021. "Optimization of the border size on the irrigation district scale – Example of the Hetao irrigation district," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    2. Xu, X. & Lewis, C. & Liu, W. & Albertson, J.D. & Kiely, G., 2012. "Analysis of single-ring infiltrometer data for soil hydraulic properties estimation: Comparison of BEST and Wu methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 34-41.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:10:p:1517-1526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.