IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v292y2024ics0378377424000246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of different long-term fertilization and cropping systems on crop yield, water balance components and water productivity in dryland farming

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Rui
  • Zhu, Miyuan
  • Mady, Ahmed Yehia
  • Huang, Mingbin
  • Yan, Xiaoying
  • Guo, Tianqi

Abstract

Water resources are becoming increasingly scarce, and improving water productivity (WP) is crucial to the development of dryland farming on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Fertilization and cropping systems are important measures to improve WP, and tracking their long-term effects on water balance components is helpful for water use and risk management. In this study, the calibrated and validated Hydrus-1D model was used to simulate the dynamic changes of water balance components under four different fertilization treatments (without fertilization, CK; 120 kg ha−1 N and 26.2 kg ha−1 P, NP; 75 t ha−1 manure, M; 120 kg ha−1 N, 26.2 kg ha−1 P, and 75 t ha−1 manure, NPM) and three cropping systems (winter wheat monoculture, WWM; spring maize monoculture, SMM; wheat-wheat-maize rotation, WMR) from 1985 to 2020, with differences in crop yields and WP analyzed. Compared to CK, NPM, NP, and M treatments increased the average yield by 201.9%, 161.7%, and 130.6%; increased the inter-annual yield variations by 191.2%, 149.3%, and 144%; increased transpiration by 80.4%, 58.7%, and 37.5%; reduced evaporation by 18.8%, 5.6%, and 2.3%; decreased deep percolation in the 3 m profile by 44.7%, 60.7%, and 41.1%; and increased WP by 174.5%, 130.8%, and 110.2%, respectively. Values under the three cropping systems occurred in the order SMM>WWM>WMR for normalized crop yield, SMM>WMR>WWM for transpiration, WWM>WMR>SMM for evaporation, and SMM>WWM>WMR for annual average WP. Our results suggest fertilization significantly increases crop yield and WP, with NPM fertilization treatment having the highest WP, but results in large inter-annual yield variations in dryland farming. Spring maize monoculture had the highest yield and WP in this study, while the rotation system balanced the water use differences. These results provide useful information for formulating water management practices for regional dryland farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Rui & Zhu, Miyuan & Mady, Ahmed Yehia & Huang, Mingbin & Yan, Xiaoying & Guo, Tianqi, 2024. "Effects of different long-term fertilization and cropping systems on crop yield, water balance components and water productivity in dryland farming," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:292:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424000246
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424000246
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108689?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:292:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424000246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.