IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v292y2024ics037837742400009x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the feasibility of sprinkler irrigation schemes and their adaptation to future climate change in groundwater over-exploitation regions

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Xueliang
  • Ding, Beibei
  • Hou, Yonghao
  • Feng, Puyu
  • Liu, De Li
  • Srinivasan, Raghavan
  • Chen, Yong

Abstract

Promoting appropriate water-saving irrigation is an important pathway to alleviate groundwater overexploitation in irrigated agriculture. Whether an alternative irrigation method is feasible relies on quantitative assessments of its impacts on crop yield and hydrological cycle, especially in the groundwater overdraft area that faces a dilemma between water scarcity and food security. Using a groundwater-module-improved SWAT (Soil & Water Assessment Tool) model, five GCMs (General Circulation Models) projections of CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6), and a linear programming algorithm, sprinkler irrigation was simulated, evaluated, and optimized in a representative global groundwater mining location, the piedmont plain of the North China Plain. During the historical period (1993–2012), the results showed that, in general, sprinkler irrigation had advantages in benefiting crop transpiration of winter wheat and reducing percolation, hence improving water use efficiency with reference to traditional surface irrigation. Specifically, compared to traditional surface irrigation schemes, winter wheat yields increased by 12%− 14% with a 225 mm irrigation quota; they were stable with a 150 mm irrigation quota; but they decreased by 4% with a 75 mm irrigation quota. The shallow groundwater tables would decline at an average rate of 1.29 m/yr, 0.83 m/yr, and 0.35 m/yr, respectively, under sprinkler irrigation with 225 mm, 150 mm, and 75 mm irrigation quotas. Future climate changes (increased precipitation, air temperatures, and CO2 concentration) would bring effects of improving wheat yield by 6%− 7% and increasing groundwater vertical recharge by 58%− 122% in 2030–2049. The variations of predicted future shallow groundwater tables were − 0.37 m/yr, 0.01 m/yr, and 0.40 m/yr with the 225 mm, 150 mm, and 75 mm irrigation quotas, respectively, in the SSP2–4.5 scenario; and the corresponding results were − 0.45 m/yr, − 0.05 m/yr, and 0.34 m/yr in the SSP5–8.5 scenario. The optimization results showed that sprinkler irrigation could be implemented in approximately 50% of the study area to achieve shallow groundwater equilibrium and stable wheat production simultaneously in the near future. And the dominant sprinkler irrigation schedule after optimization was found to be scheme S3 (irrigation frequency for wheat was 5 times) with a limited irrigation quota of 150 mm. This study provides detailed data for planning sprinkler water-saving irrigation regimes and groundwater pumping strategies in China’s breadbasket, as well as a reference for global irrigated agriculture with over-drafted aquifers to balance groundwater conservation and grain production.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Xueliang & Ding, Beibei & Hou, Yonghao & Feng, Puyu & Liu, De Li & Srinivasan, Raghavan & Chen, Yong, 2024. "Assessing the feasibility of sprinkler irrigation schemes and their adaptation to future climate change in groundwater over-exploitation regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:292:y:2024:i:c:s037837742400009x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742400009X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:292:y:2024:i:c:s037837742400009x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.