IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v273y2022ics0378377422004607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy calibration and evaluation of capacitance-based soil moisture sensors for a variety of soil properties

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Bingze
  • Wang, Chunmei
  • Gu, Xingfa
  • Zhou, Xiang
  • Ma, Ming
  • Li, Lei
  • Feng, Zhuangzhuang
  • Ding, Tianyu
  • Li, Xiaofeng
  • Jiang, Tao
  • Li, Xiaojie
  • Zheng, Xingming

Abstract

Accurate measurement of soil moisture (θ) is key to hydrology and agriculture research. Soil moisture sensor technology is the predominant method for measuring θ, and such measurements are used as a standard for evaluating results from remote sensing and data assimilation. Therefore, improving the θ measurement accuracy of soil moisture sensors is of great significance. This study used the capacitance-based soil moisture sensor (5TM, Decagon Devices, Inc.) as an example to illustrate the necessity of calibration. The 5TM soil moisture sensor calculates θ by measuring the dielectric constant (ε) of the soil medium, and ε is affected by soil properties (texture, salinity, soil organic matter, etc.). Consequently, a common calibration model (CCM) was developed to calibrate θ from the 5TM sensor by incorporating the soil properties using soil samples collected from 17 sites in 13 provinces in China at 4 different depths. First, the θ change experiments were conducted in the laboratory for each soil sample. Second, a linear calibration model (LCM) was applied to calibrate the 5TM measured soil moisture (θ5TM) based on “true” soil moisture (θtrue) assessed through the gravimetric method. The results indicated (1) high correlation coefficient (R=0.95) was found for θ5TM and θtrue, but with a high root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.051 m3m−3, and a more significant underestimation with increasing θ; (2) LCM calibration results (θLCM) showed a higher R (0.99) and a lower RMSE (0.017 m3m−3). Finally, the CCM was established through relating the LCM coefficients (aLCMandbLCM) and soil properties based on multiple regression, with RMSE of 0.126 m3m−3 and 0.023 m3m−3 for aCCMandbCCM respectively. The CCM calibrated result (θCCM) showed an RMSE of 0.02 m3m−3 and R of 0.98. CCM can almost replace LCM in terms of similar accuracy. In this study, a CCM for soil moisture sensors is proposed, which provides a new approach for soil moisture sensor calibration.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Bingze & Wang, Chunmei & Gu, Xingfa & Zhou, Xiang & Ma, Ming & Li, Lei & Feng, Zhuangzhuang & Ding, Tianyu & Li, Xiaofeng & Jiang, Tao & Li, Xiaojie & Zheng, Xingming, 2022. "Accuracy calibration and evaluation of capacitance-based soil moisture sensors for a variety of soil properties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:273:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422004607
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422004607
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benoit P. Guillod & Boris Orlowsky & Diego G. Miralles & Adriaan J. Teuling & Sonia I. Seneviratne, 2015. "Reconciling spatial and temporal soil moisture effects on afternoon rainfall," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-6, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shasha Song & Isaac R. Santos & Huaming Yu & Faming Wang & William C. Burnett & Thomas S. Bianchi & Junyu Dong & Ergang Lian & Bin Zhao & Lawrence Mayer & Qingzhen Yao & Zhigang Yu & Bochao Xu, 2022. "A global assessment of the mixed layer in coastal sediments and implications for carbon storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Hsin Hsu & Paul A. Dirmeyer, 2023. "Soil moisture-evaporation coupling shifts into new gears under increasing CO2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:273:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422004607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.